BREAKING NEWS

Author name: chadadmin

Episodes

Trump’s Chief Economic Policy Advisor defends the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Rep. Biggs also weighed in

On this episode of the podcast, Amanda Head dives into the economic and legislative battles shaping America’s future. First, White House Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran breaks down President Trump’s sweeping economic bill, defending it against criticism from the left. Miran explains how the legislation fuels investment, slashes taxes, boosts job growth, and brings in trillions through trade tariffs — all while keeping inflation in check and countering foreign economic aggression, including a major reversal by Canada. This episode is further enhanced by a conversation with Arizona Congressman Andy Biggs who discusses the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on judicial overreach, the need for immigration and border reform, and the real-world benefits of Trump-era tax cuts. The Arizona Republican also outlines election integrity efforts in his home state and sounds the alarm on activist overreach in the Senate. Hosts & Guests Amanda Head Host Rep. Andy Biggs Arizona Congressman Stephen Miran Chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisors Information Channel Furthermore with Amanda Head Creator Amanda Head Years Active 1 Episodes Rating Clean Copyright ©

All Things Trump, Articles, Elections, Politics & Policy

Trump’s fight to keep non-citizens off voter rolls reignites in second term

All Things Trump / Articles / Elections / Politics & Policy Trump’s fight to keep non-citizens off voter rolls reignites in second term Part one of President Donald Trump’s battle to keep illegal aliens off voter rolls began near the end of his first term and will likely come hurtling back in the near future. By: The Supreme Court has never made a determination on the legal merits of the argument that noncitizens should not be counted in the United States census, but may soon be forced to do so. The fight to clarify the census and subsequently adjust congressional seats, Electoral College votes and federal funding, is coming down the pike, according to White House deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller. Miller indicated last month that he’s eager to dive straight in and that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will help lead the effort. Trump has at his disposal a number of avenues to accomplish his goal, one of which includes Lutnick’s agency. Utilizing this route, the Commerce Department could propose adding a census question to distinguish citizens, legal permanent residents, and unauthorized immigrants, as suggested by a lawsuit filed by Republican-led states and the Department of Commerce in January 2025. The data could then be used to exclude noncitizens from apportionment, though not necessarily from the overall count. Republican support for this approach is growing, with bills introduced by Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-N.C., and Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., to mandate a citizenship question and thus exclude noncitizens from apportionment. A GOP-controlled Congress could facilitate approval of such questions, due by 2028. The Supreme Court’s 2019 ruling rejected the citizenship question due to procedural issues, and demanded a stronger justification for having the case reviewed by the Supreme Court before going to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Amending the Census Act is an option Furthermore, Trump could work with Congress to pass legislation amending the Census Act to exclude noncitizens from apportionment counts or mandate a citizenship question. Bills like those proposed by Edwards and Hagerty aim to achieve this, but such legislation would need to redefine “persons” in the 14th Amendment’s apportionment clause to exclude noncitizens, a significant departure from historical practice. It could also direct the Census Bureau to use citizen-only data for apportionment. With a Republican-controlled Congress, the winds are now more favorable. Passage is significantly more likely than in 2020, when a similar House bill passed on a party-line vote (206-202) but stalled in the Democratic-controlled Senate. President Donald Trump, on his first day in office, rescinded a Biden-era executive order on January 20, 2025, which had reaffirmed counting all residents regardless of immigration status, signaling intent to revisit this policy. With a GOP-controlled Congress, there may be less political resistance to try again. Additionally, preparations for the 2030 census will begin during Trump’s second term, and federal law requires proposed census questions to be submitted to Congress two years prior, which gives a window to influence the process. Estimates of illegal alien populations vary due to inconsistent methods and tracking, but based on the most reliable and recent data from multiple sources including the Department of Homeland Security, the state with the highest number of illegal aliens is California, with 2.6 million. Texas took the number two spot with 2.06 million, and Florida comes in at third with 560,000. New York (with 540,000)  and New Jersey (with 440,000) rounds off the top five. Despite the influx of illegal aliens to California, it lost a congressional seat due to the number of residents fleeing the state. The Orange County Register reported that California lost 817,669 residents in 2023 for a net outmigration of 341,866 citizens. If that trend continues, according to Thad Kousser, who is an expert in California and national politics and a professor of political science at UC San Diego, California will lose another four seats by 2030, even without census criteria changing. Texas would hypothetically gain three seats and Florida would gain three. Whether noncitizens count for census matters that affect representation In 2020, the Trump administration sought to exclude noncitizens from the U.S. Census count which is used to apportion congressional seats and Electoral College votes, a move that sparked significant controversy. In July of that year, President Donald Trump issued a memorandum directing the Census Bureau to use administrative records to identify and exclude undocumented immigrants from the apportionment count, arguing that including them dilutes the political power of citizens and constitutes voter suppression. The administration argued that the Constitution’s mandate to count “persons” did not explicitly require counting noncitizens for apportionment. This effort faced immediate legal challenges from blue states and cities, many of which were sanctuary jurisdictions, and immigrant advocacy groups, who argued the policy violated the Constitution and would discourage immigrant participation in the census, potentially undercounting communities with large noncitizen populations. The Supreme Court ultimately blocked the Trump administration’s plan in December 2020, ruling that the memorandum was premature and lacked sufficient justification, though it did not address the merits of the Administrations’ argument. Critics, including the American Civil Liberties Union, hailed the decision as a victory for fair representation, while supporters of the policy, including then-Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, argued it was necessary to ensure electoral fairness. Without time for the issue to play out further, the Census Bureau claimed it was constrained by time and logistical challenges, and ultimately included all residents in the 2020 count. TOP STORIES Trump’s fight to keep non-citizens off voter rolls reignites in second term Hegseth announces new intel on US bombing Iran, criticizes media for pushing preliminary report Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda LATEST EPISODES Supreme Court strikes back, Jesse Binnall says anti-Trump, rogue judges just got checked Trump’s strategic strike on Iran crippled their nuclear ambitions, sparking a new path for regime change Trump’s precision strike on Iran sent a global message, Victoria Coates talks on restoring American deterrence Iranian threats,

Episodes

Supreme Court strikes back, Jesse Binnall says anti-Trump, rogue judges just got checked

On this episode of the podcast, Jesse Binnall, partner at the Binnall Law Group and former attorney for President Donald Trump breaks down the Supreme Court’s pivotal ruling on nationwide injunctions, a decision that curbs the power of individual federal judges to halt executive actions. Binnall criticizes activist liberal judges for political overreach while commending conservative jurists for practicing restraint. Binnall also dives into the growing ideological divide in the federal judiciary, particularly in Washington, D.C. and argues Congress should act to rein in the influence of left-leaning courts. Finally, Binnall weighs into the ongoing legal battles facing Donald Trump, including the high-profile civil fraud case in New York and the criminal trial in Georgia — both of which he predicts the president will overcome. You can follow Jesse Binnall, Amanda Head, and this podcast on X by searching for their respective handles: @JBinnall, @AmandaHead, @FurthermorePod. Hosts & Guests Amanda Head Host Jesse R. Binnall Partner, Binnall Law Group Information Channel Furthermore with Amanda Head Creator Amanda Head Years Active 1 Episodes Rating Clean Copyright ©

Articles, Government, White House

Hegseth announces new intel on US bombing Iran, criticizes media for pushing preliminary report

Articles / Government / White House Hegseth announces new intel on US bombing Iran, criticizes media for pushing preliminary report Initial reports, including a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency report (DIA), found differing conclusions about the success of the US strikes on Iran’s three nuclear processing sites. By: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, speaking at a Pentagon press conference on Thursday, defended the U.S. military’s recent strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, asserting that the operation “devastated” Iran’s nuclear ambitions. He emphasized that the strikes, part of “Operation Midnight Hammer,” targeted only nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, and did not aim at Iranian troops or civilians. Hegseth praised President Donald Trump’s leadership, calling the mission “bold” and “brilliant,” and highlighted the skill of American pilots who flew 36 hours through enemy territory. After mainstream media sources reported on the initial Defense Intelligence Agency report, he took aim at outlets like The New York Times and CNN for what he called “fake news” that misrepresented the operation’s success, demeaning the pilots involved. Hegseth cited the United Nations’ Atomic Energy Commission as calling the damage “enormous.” He also pointed to CIA Director John Ratcliff saying Iran’s nuclear program has been “severely damaged.” In a particularly pointed moment, Hegseth looked at the media and said, “You, and I mean specifically YOU, the press, you cheer against Trump so hard, it’s in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump, because you want him not to be successful so bad, you have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes. You have to hope maybe they weren’t effective.” Hegseth also warned Iran that any forceful retaliation would prompt a U.S. response “significantly exceeding” the initial strikes. He underscored that the U.S. does not seek war but is prepared to act decisively to protect American interests and allies. Hegseth hailed the men and women who carried out the mission and questioned press coverage, asking, “How many stories have been written about how hard it is to, I don’t know, fly a plane for 36 hours? Has MSNBC done that story? Has Fox?  Have we done the story how hard that is?” TOP STORIES Hegseth announces new intel on US bombing Iran, criticizes media for pushing preliminary report Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda ‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past LATEST EPISODES Trump’s precision strike on Iran sent a global message, Victoria Coates talks on restoring American deterrence Iranian threats, transgender ideology & the ‘Nimbus’ COVID variant: The fight for sanity in a WOKE world Leftists chant, “No Kings” but it was Biden’s Admin who directed FBI to target innocent Americans for beliefs Fleitz: Biden’s weak Iran policy made regime $100B wealthier, funded Hamas Oct. 7 slaughter of Israelis ‘One electromagnetic pulse attack & we’re set back to 1871, Iran is plotting it now,’ warns top expert RELATED ARTICLES Hegseth announces new intel on US bombing Iran, criticizes media for pushing preliminary report Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda ‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump Second Lady Vance launches reading initiative to combat abysmal literacy rates Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’

Articles, Government, White House

Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community

Articles / Government / White House Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community Trump’s NATO victory could be undermined by two boiling pots: his own intel team’s differing takes on Iran strike’s success and a tightly fisted Spain that refuses to pony up its share of NATO costs. By: At the yearly North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague, Netherlands, President Donald Trump arrived victorious. The alliance of nations reached an agreement, at Trump’s urging, for all members to increase their defense spending to five percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) except for Spain. Despite the outlier, the victory is a “historic achievement” for Trump, says former Deputy National Security Advisor Victoria Coates. Coates also told Just The News that, “This has been the situation that’s been festering since the early 70s. My old boss, Donald Rumsfeld, was ambassador to NATO in 1974, and he was writing to then-Secretary Kissinger, saying, ‘we are creating this dangerous, dangerous culture of dependence, and the Europeans aren’t doing enough, and they need to do more.’ And that was allowed over the subsequent 50 years to just go on, and the only person who made a stink about it was President Trump.” From 2% to 5% of GDP Prior to the heightened target, most NATO members contributed just over 2% of their GDP on defense spending. The new target, which was proposed by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, allows flexibility to reach 5% by way of 3.5% allocated specifically for conventional defense capabilities and an additional 1.5% directed towards broader security-related investments, including domestic infrastructure and cybersecurity. Spain secured an exemption from the 5% spending target primarily due to what they claim are domestic political and economic constraints. Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, argued in a letter to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte that committing to 5% would be “unreasonable and counterproductive,” as it would undermine Spain’s welfare state and social spending priorities, such as pensions and green initiatives. Spain’s defense spending in 2024 was the lowest of all NATO members, only 1.28% of GDP. Sánchez maintained that 2.1% was sufficient to meet NATO’s updated capability targets for troops and equipment without necessitating drastic fiscal adjustments. Sánchez also argued that Spain’s geographic distance to Russia reduces its immediate security threat, and meeting the 5% target could hinder EU efforts to develop its own defense ecosystem. Trump: No free ride Speaking at a press conference at the summit, President Donald Trump told the press that Spain’s refusal to meet the 5% target was “terrible” because Spain’s economy “is doing very well. And that economy could be blown right out of the water with something bad happening.” “We’re negotiating with Spain on a trade deal, and we’re going to make them pay twice as much. I like Spain. It’s a great place and they are great people, but Spain is the only country out of all the countries that refuses to pay. So they want a little bit of a free ride, but they will have to pay it back to us on trade because I’m not going to let that happen. It’s unfair,” he continued. Another battlefront facing Trump is within his own intelligence community. The recent strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites have apparently produced conflicting intelligence on how much damage the fourteen GBU-57A/B MOP 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bombs inflicted. In the hours following the strike, Trump gave an address to the nation in which he characterized the strikes as “a spectacular military success” and that Iran’s three nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely and totally obliterated.” On Monday, Trump again said that the damage to the sites was “monumental.” Leaks, disinformation and damage An intelligence report leaked Tuesday claims the strikes did not completely destroy Iran’s nuclear program but likely set it back by only a few months. The classified report was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and is reportedly based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command (CENTCOM) in the aftermath of the strikes. Also conflicting with the leak is the admission by Esmail Baghaei, spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, who told Al Jazeera that Iran’s nuclear installations “have been badly damaged, that’s for sure.” As of Wednesday, the Trump administration reportedly will begin limiting classified information it shares with Congress, suggesting the leak may have come from Capitol Hill. Further conflicts in messaging came to the surface because, prior to the U.S. strike on Iran, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard told Congress in March that “the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini [sic] has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” Since then, Trump said Gabbard “is wrong” and Gabbard said she and Trump “are on the same page.” Perhaps the most damning indictment of the intel assessment is the source of the leak, which calls into question its veracity. Coates, widely considered a genuine expert on security issues, told Just The News, “The way this early Defense Intelligence Agency assessment was leaked is the same way the Steele Dossier was leaked and the same way the “Hunter Biden’s laptop is Russian disinformation” was leaked.” Coates pointed out that “the same reporter, Natasha Bertrand, is the person who received those two leaks and then received this one.” It is now widely accepted that both the Steele Dossier and the notion that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation, were both proved to be false. TOP STORIES Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda ‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump LATEST EPISODES Trump’s precision strike on Iran sent a global message, Victoria Coates talks on restoring American deterrence Iranian threats, transgender ideology & the ‘Nimbus’ COVID variant: The

Episodes

Trump’s strategic strike on Iran crippled their nuclear ambitions, sparking a new path for regime change

On this episode of the podcast, foreign policy expert and former Trump advisor Dr. Walid Phares joins to unpack the recent U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, as well as the global implications. Dr. Phares explains why reports downplaying the damage are misleading, emphasizing how the strikes crippled Iran’s ability to produce nuclear weapons, and outlines how the regime now faces at least a two-year setback. The author of “Iran” also highlights the importance of moral support from leadership in catalyzing regime change from within. He warns of Tehran’s likely attempts to suppress dissent internally while pushing for international deals to secure their grip on power. You can learn more about Dr. Walid Phares or his work by following him on X: @WalidPhares. Hosts & Guests Amanda Head Host Dr. Walid Phares Foreign Policy Expert & Author Information Channel Furthermore with Amanda Head Creator Amanda Head Years Active 1 Episodes Rating Clean Copyright ©

Episodes

Trump’s precision strike on Iran sent a global message, Victoria Coates talks on restoring American deterrence

On this episode of the podcast former Deputy National Security Advisor and Vice President of National Security and Foreign Policy at The Heritage Foundation, Victoria Coates breaks down the most pressing issue today: the United States taking action against Iran to destroy and dismantle their nuclear enrichment centers and program as a whole. Coates offers her expert analysis on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing threats from China and Russia, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and the importance of energy independence in global diplomacy. Together, Amanda and Victoria dissect how these complex geopolitical dynamics intersect with domestic policy, why America’s adversaries feel emboldened, and what a renewed national security strategy under a future conservative administration might look like. You can follow this podcast, Amanda Head, and Victoria Coates on X (formerly Twitter) by searching for the respective handle: @FurthermorePod, @AmandaHead, @VictoriaCoates. Hosts & Guests Amanda Head Host Victoria Coates Former Deputy National Security Advisor & The Heritage Foundation’s Vice President of National Security & Foreign Policy Information Channel Furthermore with Amanda Head Creator Amanda Head Years Active 1 Episodes Rating Clean Copyright ©

Articles, Government, White House

Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia

Articles / Government / White House Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia Trump hoping it is “out of their system”: The threat is not over for Israel or the United States, but Monday’s retaliation strikes on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar appear to have been of little effect, perhaps by design. By: In a historic sequence of events, the world went from watching Iranian nuclear sites obliterated, to witnessing Iran’s so-called retaliation, to then processing a ceasefire in just over 48 hours. The extraordinary display of U.S. soft and hard power by President Donald Trump should have impact far outside the Middle East, particularly with Russia and China, according to security expert Rebecca Grant. “This is the cornerstone of our deterrence and containment policy. So the success against Iran’s air defenses has really strengthened U.S. global military policy and stability around the world, and it should scare China and Russia quite a lot,” Grant, who serves as vice president of the Lexington Institute, told Just The News, Ret. USAF Colonel Rob Maness agreed. “President Trump is masterfully reestablishing conventional deterrence in the Middle East and establishing nuclear deterrence in the Middle East for the first time,” he said. “That same mental model and message is going into the brains of President Putin (of Russia) and President President Xi (of China), but especially to President Putin and his people.” The United States’ Al Udeid Air Base, situated just southwest of the Qatari capital of Doha reportedly endured little damage after an estimated 13 of 14 missiles from Iran were intercepted. That base is also home to other foreign air forces, including small detachments from the UK and Australia. It is claimed to be the largest air base in the Mideast. On Monday, Iran’s Tasnim news agency reported that Tehran conducted missile strikes on U.S. military bases in Qatar. Qatar-based Al Jazeera observed missiles in the skies above the Gulf state, which hosts the U.S. Al Udeid airbase and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). Initial reports indicated that Iran also fired missiles at a base in Iraq. However, Reuters reported that, per a U.S. military official, no such attack took place at any other bases. In a statement on X, Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari posted: “We express the State of Qatar’s strong condemnation of the attack on Al Udeid Air Base by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, and consider it a flagrant violation of the State of Qatar’s sovereignty and airspace, as well as of international law and the United Nations Charter. We affirm that the State of Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportional to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression and in accordance with international law.” Evacuated as precaution He also confirmed that the base had been evacuated prior to the attack and that there were no injuries or fatalities: “The base had been evacuated earlier, following established security and precautionary measures, given the tensions in the region. All necessary steps were taken to ensure the safety of personnel at the base, including Qatari Armed Forces members, friendly forces, and others. We confirm that no injuries or human casualties resulted from the attack.” Reuters reported that Iran informed the United States through two separate diplomatic channels hours ahead of the U.S. military base attacks in Qatar. The attack came hours after Qatar closed its airspace and the U.S. Embassy issued a shelter-in-place advisory for American citizens in the country, stating it was “out of an abundance of caution.” PBS is also reporting the Iraqis gave advance notice. As for Trump, he posted a statement to Truth Social Monday saying in part: “they’ve gotten it all out of their system,” Retaliation partly symbolic After Saturday’s attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, which Trump touted as “totally destroyed,” he posted: “Any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with far greater than what was witnessed tonight.” Following the United States’ strike in 2020 that killed Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Quds force division of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran vowed “harsh retaliation.” However, in what is generally considered a symbolic response five days later, Iran attacked two Iraqi air bases, Al-Asad and Erbil which produced no fatalities. Mirroring Monday’s events in Qatar, Iran reportedly informed Iraq in advance, allowing U.S. forces to take cover, resulting in no American deaths, though more than 100 U.S. personnel suffered traumatic brain injuries in 2020, according to NPR. The advance warning in both instances suggests that the retaliations are at least partly symbolic, aimed at satisfying domestic calls for a reaction while dodging a broader conflict or escalation. Amid a flurry of posts to his Truth Social account on Monday, Trump said, “Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered. There have been 14 missiles fired — 13 were knocked down, and 1 was “set free,” because it was headed in a nonthreatening direction.” Confirming reports of no casualties of Americans, he stated, “I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.” Reemphasizing his desire for peace after the tit-for-tat, Trump said, in part, “Perhaps, Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same.” Hours later, the ceasefire was announced. Trump used the Qataris as intermediaries with Tehran after Trump spoke with the country’s leader. That conversation occurred just hours after Iran launched a missile barrage at a U.S. Air Force base near Doha, an attack that was repelled by anti-ballistic missiles, multiple officials told Just the News. Trump had thanked the Iranians for giving Qatar a heads-up about the attack, and it led to unexpected negotiations for a ceasefire, the officials said. Trump called the Emir of Qatar, telling him he could get Israel to agree to a ceasefire, and asked the Emir’s help getting Iran to commit to the same, the officials said. Qatari Prime

Episodes

Iranian threats, transgender ideology & the ‘Nimbus’ COVID variant: The fight for sanity in a WOKE world

On this episode of the podcast, Congressman Randy Weber, women’s sports advocate Paula Scanlan, and Dr. Peter McCullough all join podcast host Amanda Head for a conversation about how we can continue defending our republic despite living in a ‘woke-dominant’ world. Rep. Randy Weber (R-TX) outlines the growing threat of Iran and highlights the national security urgency of sealing the southern border. He contrasts Biden’s failure with Trump’s effective border and immigration policies, especially those that benefited the agricultural labor market. Meanwhile, Paula Scanlan breaks down a recent House Republican bill that blocks federal funding for gender transition procedures. The pair react to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision upholding Tennessee’s ban on gender surgeries for minors and expose the hypocrisy of Democrats pushing radical trans policies despite a New York Times poll showing most Americans — including 67% of Democrats — oppose men in women’s sports. Scanlan also slams the NCAA for abandoning female athletes and issues a call to action for more women to speak out. And finally, Dr. Peter McCullough joins to unpack the latest Omicron subvariant “NB 1.8.1”—nicknamed “Nimbus” and why nasal hygiene products like Immune Mist and Spry could be vital for prevention. He also praises General Mills and Heinz for moving away from toxic artificial dyes by 2027, warns about the dangers of gender transition treatments for children with autism, and renews his call to ban pharmaceutical ads to restore trust in the media. Dr. McCullough ends by endorsing Trump’s idea of giving $1,000 stock market accounts to every newborn as a bold investment in America’s future. Hosts & Guests Amanda Head Host Rep. Randy Weber Congressman of the 14th Congressional District of Texas Paula Scanlan Former University of Pennsylvania Swimmer & Advocate for Women’s Rights in Sports Peter McCullough, MD, MPH American Cardiologist & Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company Information Channel Furthermore with Amanda Head Creator Amanda Head Years Active 1 Episodes Rating Clean Copyright ©

Episodes

Leftists chant, “No Kings” but it was Biden’s Admin who directed FBI to target innocent Americans for beliefs

On this episode of the podcast, political science professor and host of The P.A.S. Report podcast Nicholas Giordano unpacks his explosive opinion column published in The Federalist that criticizes the Biden Administration’s National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism. Giordano warns that the document uses dangerously vague definitions that allow for the targeting of political opponents — including parents, traditional Catholics and other innocent American voices. He breaks down the strategy’s four pillars: public-private partnerships, control over information, manipulating public awareness, and advancing a left-wing agenda. Giordano calls for decisive action from President Trump and Congress to dismantle this framework. You can learn more about Nicholas Giordano or his work by visiting his website: www.PASReport.com. You can also follow this podcast, Amanda Head, or Nicholas Giordano on X by searching for the relevant handles: @FurthermorePod, @AmandaHead, @PASReport. Hosts & Guests Amanda Head Host Nicholas Giordano Host, The P.A.S. Report Podcast & Tenured Political Science Professor Information Channel Furthermore with Amanda Head Creator Amanda Head Years Active 1 Episodes Rating Clean Copyright ©

Scroll to Top