BREAKING NEWS

Articles

Articles, Government, White House

Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community

Articles / Government / White House Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community Trump’s NATO victory could be undermined by two boiling pots: his own intel team’s differing takes on Iran strike’s success and a tightly fisted Spain that refuses to pony up its share of NATO costs. By: At the yearly North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague, Netherlands, President Donald Trump arrived victorious. The alliance of nations reached an agreement, at Trump’s urging, for all members to increase their defense spending to five percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) except for Spain. Despite the outlier, the victory is a “historic achievement” for Trump, says former Deputy National Security Advisor Victoria Coates. Coates also told Just The News that, “This has been the situation that’s been festering since the early 70s. My old boss, Donald Rumsfeld, was ambassador to NATO in 1974, and he was writing to then-Secretary Kissinger, saying, ‘we are creating this dangerous, dangerous culture of dependence, and the Europeans aren’t doing enough, and they need to do more.’ And that was allowed over the subsequent 50 years to just go on, and the only person who made a stink about it was President Trump.” From 2% to 5% of GDP Prior to the heightened target, most NATO members contributed just over 2% of their GDP on defense spending. The new target, which was proposed by NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, allows flexibility to reach 5% by way of 3.5% allocated specifically for conventional defense capabilities and an additional 1.5% directed towards broader security-related investments, including domestic infrastructure and cybersecurity. Spain secured an exemption from the 5% spending target primarily due to what they claim are domestic political and economic constraints. Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, argued in a letter to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte that committing to 5% would be “unreasonable and counterproductive,” as it would undermine Spain’s welfare state and social spending priorities, such as pensions and green initiatives. Spain’s defense spending in 2024 was the lowest of all NATO members, only 1.28% of GDP. Sánchez maintained that 2.1% was sufficient to meet NATO’s updated capability targets for troops and equipment without necessitating drastic fiscal adjustments. Sánchez also argued that Spain’s geographic distance to Russia reduces its immediate security threat, and meeting the 5% target could hinder EU efforts to develop its own defense ecosystem. Trump: No free ride Speaking at a press conference at the summit, President Donald Trump told the press that Spain’s refusal to meet the 5% target was “terrible” because Spain’s economy “is doing very well. And that economy could be blown right out of the water with something bad happening.” “We’re negotiating with Spain on a trade deal, and we’re going to make them pay twice as much. I like Spain. It’s a great place and they are great people, but Spain is the only country out of all the countries that refuses to pay. So they want a little bit of a free ride, but they will have to pay it back to us on trade because I’m not going to let that happen. It’s unfair,” he continued. Another battlefront facing Trump is within his own intelligence community. The recent strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites have apparently produced conflicting intelligence on how much damage the fourteen GBU-57A/B MOP 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bombs inflicted. In the hours following the strike, Trump gave an address to the nation in which he characterized the strikes as “a spectacular military success” and that Iran’s three nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely and totally obliterated.” On Monday, Trump again said that the damage to the sites was “monumental.” Leaks, disinformation and damage An intelligence report leaked Tuesday claims the strikes did not completely destroy Iran’s nuclear program but likely set it back by only a few months. The classified report was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and is reportedly based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command (CENTCOM) in the aftermath of the strikes. Also conflicting with the leak is the admission by Esmail Baghaei, spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, who told Al Jazeera that Iran’s nuclear installations “have been badly damaged, that’s for sure.” As of Wednesday, the Trump administration reportedly will begin limiting classified information it shares with Congress, suggesting the leak may have come from Capitol Hill. Further conflicts in messaging came to the surface because, prior to the U.S. strike on Iran, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard told Congress in March that “the IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini [sic] has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” Since then, Trump said Gabbard “is wrong” and Gabbard said she and Trump “are on the same page.” Perhaps the most damning indictment of the intel assessment is the source of the leak, which calls into question its veracity. Coates, widely considered a genuine expert on security issues, told Just The News, “The way this early Defense Intelligence Agency assessment was leaked is the same way the Steele Dossier was leaked and the same way the “Hunter Biden’s laptop is Russian disinformation” was leaked.” Coates pointed out that “the same reporter, Natasha Bertrand, is the person who received those two leaks and then received this one.” It is now widely accepted that both the Steele Dossier and the notion that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation, were both proved to be false. TOP STORIES Trump’s next battlefields: a NATO-snubbing Spain and a conflicted U.S. intel community Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda ‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump LATEST EPISODES Trump’s precision strike on Iran sent a global message, Victoria Coates talks on restoring American deterrence Iranian threats, transgender ideology & the ‘Nimbus’ COVID variant: The

Articles, Government, White House

Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia

Articles / Government / White House Trump bombed Iran into a ceasefire and sent a loud message to China and Russia Trump hoping it is “out of their system”: The threat is not over for Israel or the United States, but Monday’s retaliation strikes on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar appear to have been of little effect, perhaps by design. By: In a historic sequence of events, the world went from watching Iranian nuclear sites obliterated, to witnessing Iran’s so-called retaliation, to then processing a ceasefire in just over 48 hours. The extraordinary display of U.S. soft and hard power by President Donald Trump should have impact far outside the Middle East, particularly with Russia and China, according to security expert Rebecca Grant. “This is the cornerstone of our deterrence and containment policy. So the success against Iran’s air defenses has really strengthened U.S. global military policy and stability around the world, and it should scare China and Russia quite a lot,” Grant, who serves as vice president of the Lexington Institute, told Just The News, Ret. USAF Colonel Rob Maness agreed. “President Trump is masterfully reestablishing conventional deterrence in the Middle East and establishing nuclear deterrence in the Middle East for the first time,” he said. “That same mental model and message is going into the brains of President Putin (of Russia) and President President Xi (of China), but especially to President Putin and his people.” The United States’ Al Udeid Air Base, situated just southwest of the Qatari capital of Doha reportedly endured little damage after an estimated 13 of 14 missiles from Iran were intercepted. That base is also home to other foreign air forces, including small detachments from the UK and Australia. It is claimed to be the largest air base in the Mideast. On Monday, Iran’s Tasnim news agency reported that Tehran conducted missile strikes on U.S. military bases in Qatar. Qatar-based Al Jazeera observed missiles in the skies above the Gulf state, which hosts the U.S. Al Udeid airbase and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). Initial reports indicated that Iran also fired missiles at a base in Iraq. However, Reuters reported that, per a U.S. military official, no such attack took place at any other bases. In a statement on X, Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari posted: “We express the State of Qatar’s strong condemnation of the attack on Al Udeid Air Base by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, and consider it a flagrant violation of the State of Qatar’s sovereignty and airspace, as well as of international law and the United Nations Charter. We affirm that the State of Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportional to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression and in accordance with international law.” Evacuated as precaution He also confirmed that the base had been evacuated prior to the attack and that there were no injuries or fatalities: “The base had been evacuated earlier, following established security and precautionary measures, given the tensions in the region. All necessary steps were taken to ensure the safety of personnel at the base, including Qatari Armed Forces members, friendly forces, and others. We confirm that no injuries or human casualties resulted from the attack.” Reuters reported that Iran informed the United States through two separate diplomatic channels hours ahead of the U.S. military base attacks in Qatar. The attack came hours after Qatar closed its airspace and the U.S. Embassy issued a shelter-in-place advisory for American citizens in the country, stating it was “out of an abundance of caution.” PBS is also reporting the Iraqis gave advance notice. As for Trump, he posted a statement to Truth Social Monday saying in part: “they’ve gotten it all out of their system,” Retaliation partly symbolic After Saturday’s attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, which Trump touted as “totally destroyed,” he posted: “Any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with far greater than what was witnessed tonight.” Following the United States’ strike in 2020 that killed Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Quds force division of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran vowed “harsh retaliation.” However, in what is generally considered a symbolic response five days later, Iran attacked two Iraqi air bases, Al-Asad and Erbil which produced no fatalities. Mirroring Monday’s events in Qatar, Iran reportedly informed Iraq in advance, allowing U.S. forces to take cover, resulting in no American deaths, though more than 100 U.S. personnel suffered traumatic brain injuries in 2020, according to NPR. The advance warning in both instances suggests that the retaliations are at least partly symbolic, aimed at satisfying domestic calls for a reaction while dodging a broader conflict or escalation. Amid a flurry of posts to his Truth Social account on Monday, Trump said, “Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered. There have been 14 missiles fired — 13 were knocked down, and 1 was “set free,” because it was headed in a nonthreatening direction.” Confirming reports of no casualties of Americans, he stated, “I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.” Reemphasizing his desire for peace after the tit-for-tat, Trump said, in part, “Perhaps, Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same.” Hours later, the ceasefire was announced. Trump used the Qataris as intermediaries with Tehran after Trump spoke with the country’s leader. That conversation occurred just hours after Iran launched a missile barrage at a U.S. Air Force base near Doha, an attack that was repelled by anti-ballistic missiles, multiple officials told Just the News. Trump had thanked the Iranians for giving Qatar a heads-up about the attack, and it led to unexpected negotiations for a ceasefire, the officials said. Trump called the Emir of Qatar, telling him he could get Israel to agree to a ceasefire, and asked the Emir’s help getting Iran to commit to the same, the officials said. Qatari Prime

All Things Trump, Articles, Elections, Politics & Policy

Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda

All Things Trump / Articles / Elections / Politics & Policy Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda Trump’s Republican Party looks wildly different from ten years ago, and Republicans must codify and expand his populist ideas if they want to hold the majority in next year’s midterm election. By: As congressional representatives head home to campaign in their districts this week, the party priorities look very different from those of 2015. Ten years ago, when then-candidate Donald Trump descended the golden escalator at his midtown Manhattan Trump Towers property, it produced a spark that spread American populism fire throughout the Republican Party, a party which at the time was mired by warmongering, false promises of fiscal responsibility and acquiescing to leftist accusations and policy. The official party platform in 2015 remained the party agenda from the previous general election in 2012. The priorities enumerated weren’t that far off from what was listed in the 2024 party platform. But, even four months into his second term, President Donald Trump clearly took his promises seriously and is working to enact what voters sent him to Washington to do. In 2012, the Republican Platform titled “We Believe In America” was 62 pages and was adopted at the Tampa, Florida Republican National Convention. It reflected the personality and politics of then-candidate Mitt Romney. In 2024, the Republican Platform, titled “Make America Great Again,” clocked in at 16 pages, consisting of 20 clear and concise agenda items. Among those items: to seal the border and stop the migrant invasion, to carry out historic deportation operations, to make America affordable again, to make Trump’s tax cuts from 2018 permanent, to strengthen and modernize the military, to keep men out of women’s sports and to keep the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Economy The 2012 platform, in many more words, emphasized reducing the federal deficit through spending cuts and supported a balanced budget amendment with a cap on federal spending. It also advocated for a simpler, flatter tax code with lower rates for individuals and businesses to stimulate economic growth. The official party platform expressed opposition to new taxes and aimed to make the bush tax cuts from 2001 and 2003 permanent. Unsurprisingly, it promoted free market policies and reducing government interference to encourage economic growth and entrepreneurship, particularly supporting small businesses. Trump’s economic ideas similarly reflect those from the 2012 platform, with demonstrably more muscle and enactment. The Trump Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) lowered income tax rates across most brackets, with the top rate dropping from 39.6% to 37%. The standard deduction nearly doubled (e.g., $12,000 to $24,000 for married couples), benefiting about 70% of taxpayers who take it over itemizing. The Tax Policy Center estimated 65% of households saw tax cuts in 2018, averaging $1,600, though benefits skewed toward higher earners. Government reform Similar to the party platform from 2024, the 2012 platform called for rolling back excessive regulations, particularly those from the Obama administration and appointing judges who adhere to constitutional originals. It called for reducing the size and scope of the federal government, returning power to states and individuals. It advocated for eliminating wasteful programs and reforming. Sound familiar? If so, that’s because many Americans voted on this very issue in support of what is now the Department of Government Efficiency instituted under Trump. National defense and foreign policy The 2012 platform, similar to Trump’s agenda, called for maintaining a robust national defense, modernizing the military, and ensuring adequate funding. It opposed budget cuts and advocated for American exceptionalism, supporting allies like Israel and confronting adversaries like Iran. It also promoted democracy abroad, which is a departure from Trump’s platform which advocated for “no new wars” and a strong opposition to the nation-building ways of the Republicans of 2012. Social issues While many Republicans take issue with the novel “big tent” personality of the party present day, it’s undeniable that on one particular traditional issue, abortion, Trump has done more to protect the sanctity of life that any other president. The 2012 platform supported a constitutional amendment to protect unborn life and opposed  funding for abortion through organizations like. The 2012 platform also sought a constitutional amendment to define marriage  between one man and one woman. Education In 2012, the party platform, promoted parental choice and education, including charter schools, vouchers, and homeschooling. It opposed federal overreach in education. It also called for reducing federal involvement in student loans and encouraging private sector alternatives and trade schools. One of the 20 policy points in the 2014 MAGA agenda was to, “cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, radical gender ideology, and other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children.” On March 20, 2025, Trump issued an executive order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take all legally permissible steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and transfer its authority to states and local communities. TOP STORIES Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda ‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump Second Lady Vance launches reading initiative to combat abysmal literacy rates Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program LATEST EPISODES Fleitz: Biden’s weak Iran policy made regime $100B wealthier, funded Hamas Oct. 7 slaughter of Israelis ‘One electromagnetic pulse attack & we’re set back to 1871, Iran is plotting it now,’ warns top expert Army soldier branded ‘white supremacist,’ ousted from service for photo of Trump sparking Congressional defense California In Crisis: Gov. Newsom, Mayor Bass blasted over illegal immigration & public safety failures Mom-Turned-Activist takes on California’s vaccine laws in explosive court battle RELATED ARTICLES Ten years after Trump’s golden escalator announcement, Republicans campaign on transformed agenda ‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past Weekend of

Articles, Federal Agencies, Government

‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past

Articles / Federal Agencies / Government ‘Rubber stamp’ vaccine advisory board fired by RFK Jr. for conflicts of interest has revealing past CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices once recommended vaccine after official admitted it had no data on simultaneous inoculation, but “our general approach” is to give vaccines at “same time in different limbs.” By: Afederal public health advisory panel long dominated by pharmaceutical influence, whose expressed reservations about particular inoculations never stopped it from recommending them, is getting a fresh start under the drug industry’s most powerful critic. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced Monday the removal of all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, citing “persistent conflicts of interest” that made it “little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine.” Some of the current members were “last-minute appointees of the Biden administration” whose presence would have kept President Trump from appointing new members until his last year in office, Kennedy wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed. “It has never recommended against a vaccine – even those later withdrawn for safety reasons,” like the rotavirus vaccine it greenlit despite half of ACIP members having financial ties to other rotavirus vaccine makers, he said. “It has failed to scrutinize vaccine products given to babies and pregnant women” and meets behind closed doors with other groups. ACIP unanimously approved adding COVID vaccines to child and adolescent schedules in fall 2022, months after the CDC ignored it when approving a fourth mRNA shot for older people. The sudden move came a day after medical freedom activist and physician Mary Bowden, who forced the Food and Drug Administration in court to stop demonizing ivermectin for COVID treatment, noted that 11 of the 15 members who put COVID-19 vaccines on the pediatric schedule two years ago were still on the committee as of Sunday. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary told a reporter Tuesday the “clean sweep” of ACIP, as Kennedy called it, did not involve him and that Makary would defer to FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Vinay Prasad on the composition of its own Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC.) While Kennedy’s move furthers a mainstream media and medicine caricature of the vaccine skeptic – he had already created a page with ACIP’s alleged conflicts of interest in March – it doesn’t neatly fit with his early months as HHS secretary. In quick succession last month, Kennedy removed COVID vaccines from the CDC’s immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, cancelled a $700 million Moderna bird flu vaccine contract and approved Moderna’s new COVID vaccine but only for ages 65 and up and those at risk for “severe” COVID outcomes. Moderna must complete a randomized controlled trial in healthy Americans ages 50-64 if it wants vaccine approval in that demographic, Prasad said at the time, though COVID vaccine trial victim and activist Brianne Dressen faulted the study design for “heavily limiting patient reported data,” which she said means it won’t capture severe adverse events. Recommended a vaccine with ‘no data’ on interactions with others Kennedy’s op-ed said the CDC “took no significant action” after an HHS inspector general report from 2009 found that 97% of ACIP members had “omissions” on their conflict-of-interest forms. That was nine years after a House investigation found ACIP and VRBPAC had “weak to nonexistent” enforcement of conflict-of-interest rules, he said. “Committee members regularly participated in deliberations and advocated products in which they had a financial stake” and the CDC gave everyone waivers. The ACIP clipping drew cheers from some vaccine skeptics, drug industry watchdogs and a veteran chronicler of ACIP and VRBPAC, while horrifying mainstream medical organizations including the vaccine maker-funded American Academy of Pediatrics, which said it will “further endanger the health of the American public, especially children.” Brownstone Institute President Jeffrey Tucker circulated a condensed clip from ACIP’s February 21, 2018 meeting that shows advisers unanimously approving a recommendation for an adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine — containing an ingredient that enhances immune response — despite agency officials being unable to answer some questions. One official admitted they have “no data” on using that vaccine “with other adjuvanted vaccines” such as for flu and shingles, and another said the agency was unaware of any other market using “multiple adjuvanted vaccines.” “Whilst pre-clinical studies were not done using these vaccines simultaneously, our general approach to immunizations is they should be given, they can be given at the same time in different limbs,” another official said. After approval, an adviser said he had a “slight reservation” about his vote due to the “myocardial infarction [heart attack] signal” from the use of the new adjuvant in the vaccine and said they needed to look at “post-marketing data carefully.” The CDC likely wouldn’t have that data for more than two years, an official responded. “All but one ACIP member voted for universal [COVID-19] boosting even for young men with the highest myocarditis risk as late in the pandemic as fall 2023,” Emily Kopp, former investigator for nonprofit public health research group U.S. Right to Know, wrote on X. “If you were evaluating on performance, you’d fire them.” That member was Pablo Sanchez, who warned colleagues their recommendation rested on “extremely limited data on children and infants and other individuals” that was also hidden from parents, and they should be more concerned about “potential side effects, especially in young adults and in young adult males.” Former FDA regulatory review officer Jessica Adams, who has long chronicled its advisory committees and criticized the Biden administration’s FDA for sidelining its own vaccine leaders and advisers on COVID boosters, recommended Sanchez and other lone voices for ACIP. She praised former VRBPAC members Cory Meissner, who early warned of vaccine-induced myocarditis in young people, for saying the advisers need to convey to parents COVID’s miniscule risk to children, and Michael Kurilla for abstaining from a pediatric authorization vote on the basis that even a successful vaccine would quickly wane for the low-risk group. ‘Get over this political statement’ ACIP and VRBPAC gave a patina of independent review to the genetic-code delivery systems for SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins that officials deemed vaccines, and skeptics became unrelenting targets of ridicule, contempt and punishment

Articles, Government, White House

Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump

Articles / Government / White House Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump There are no riots, and if there are, it’s Trump’s fault: Evocative of the 1992 Rodney King riots and 2020 BLM riots, Los Angeles residents are bracing for more violence as tensions explode and the legacy media airbrushes reality. By: Over the weekend, parts of the city of Los Angeles once again became a riot hub, complete with structures and vehicles set on fire, cinder blocks and other dangerous objects thrown at law enforcement, and major thoroughfares intentionally blocked by thousands, impeding travel on LA’s critical freeway system. Despite the mainstream media’s promises to cover President Donald Trump and his actions more neutrally in his second term, coverage accompanied by images and videos of the violence was scant, a move that will surely shape public perception of what’s happening in the city. Protests erupted in the City of Angels on Friday, after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducted raids targeting illegal aliens at multiple city locations, including the Fashion District in downtown LA and a Home Depot parking lot, arresting more than 100 people. The demonstrations turned violent when protesters clashed with ICE agents and the Los Angeles Police Department, hurling concrete chunks and prompting the use of tear gas and flash-bang grenades to disperse crowds. By evening, the unrest had escalated, leading to a citywide LAPD-issued tactical alert as approximately 200 rioters remained near the Westlake Home Depot, defying police orders to disperse. Protests grew from peaceful to violent and destructive Throughout the weekend, the riots against federal immigration raids escalated with more violent clashes in downtown, demonstrators setting Waymo self-driving taxis on fire and throwing objects at police, prompting the LAPD to declare an unlawful assembly. On Saturday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt released a statement saying, “In recent days, violent mobs have attacked ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations in Los Angeles, California. These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States.” Leavitt announced that Trump was deploying 2,000 National Guard troops due to the inaction “California’s feckless Democrat leaders” to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester. “The Trump Administration has a zero-tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs. These criminals will be arrested and swiftly brought to justice. The Commander-in-Chief will ensure the laws of the United States are executed fully and completely.” Soft-pedaling riots as “mostly peaceful” Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, a move California Gov. Gavin Newsom has called unlawful, as tensions rose with 27 arrests reported and multiple injuries between protesters and law enforcement. The unrest saw rioters protesting against deportation to Mexico and other nations, waving Mexican flags and blocking the 101 Freeway. Authorities resorted to using tear gas and non-lethal munitions to disperse the crowds and to protect law enforcement officers. Few legacy news outfits prominently featured the shocking images, and instead gave the lion’s share of time to blaming President Trump for starting the riots by having ICE conduct a raid. The National Desk reported yesterday that Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said: “It’s an escalation that didn’t have to happen. Why were there raids? We had been told that he was going to go after violent criminals. It wasn’t a drug den. It was a Home Depot. It was places where people are working. So what was the point of doing this?” NPR in a Monday article, referred to the riots as “mostly peaceful.” In a Los Angles Times article on Sunday, Mayor Bass was quoted describing the protests as “relatively minor” and said “to say that the city is out of control, I don’t know what city they are talking about.” The Guardian‘s coverage describes the protests as “mostly peaceful” but escalating only after the National Guard’s deployment. CNN‘s Dana Bash said of the arson, rocks thrown at vehicles, and attacks on law enforcement, that this was not a “real riot.” Who was actually arrested? Bass continued her downplaying of the violent protests in a joint statement with L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis, where Bass supported Solis’ comment that “The individuals detained are hardworking Angelenos who contribute to our local economy and labor force every day.” However, Just The News on Sunday published the details surrounding some of those arrested. They include: Cuong Chanh Phan from Vietnam, whose criminal history includes a conviction for second-degree murder. From Mexico, Lionel Sanchez-Laguna’s criminal history includes discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling and vehicle, battery on spouse, or cohabitant, driving under the influence and willful cruelty to a child. Also from Mexico, Delfino Aguilar-Martines, whose criminal record includes assault with a deadly weapon that caused “great bodily injury.” Another Mexican citizen arrested was Armando Ordaz, whose criminal record includes sexual battery, receiving known or stolen property, and petty theft. At least one of the “hardworking Angelenos” hails from Peru: Jose Cristobal Hernandez-Buiron’s record includes robbery with a 10-year prison sentence. TOP STORIES Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump Second Lady Vance launches reading initiative to combat abysmal literacy rates Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ LATEST EPISODES California In Crisis: Gov. Newsom, Mayor Bass blasted over illegal immigration & public safety failures Mom-Turned-Activist takes on California’s vaccine laws in explosive court battle Tariffs, Treachery & the CCP: Rep. Moore puts his foot down to loosen China’s strategic grip on America Phil Kerpen on the clash up on Capitol Hill: Will Trump’s ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’ survive the Senate? Fight Club-Secret Service Edition: What went down at Obama’s home? Susan Crabtree’s reporting tells all RELATED ARTICLES Weekend of LA riots shows media hasn’t learned anything from America’s election of Trump Second Lady Vance launches reading initiative

Articles, Education, Politics & Policy

Second Lady Vance launches reading initiative to combat abysmal literacy rates

Education / Politics & Policy Second Lady Vance launches reading initiative to combat abysmal literacy rates Literacy rates have plummeted over the last half-century, with 34% of U.S. fourth-grade students below basic reading levels in 2022. 31% were below what’s considered “proficient.” By: On June 1, Second Lady Usha Vance launched her literacy initiative called the Summer Reading Challenge, which seeks to improve childhood literacy among students in kindergarten through 8th grade, the ages which are the most vital to literacy education and improvement. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reported a decline in reading proficiency, with 2023 scores for 13-year-olds dropping 4 points compared to 2020, and 9-year-olds scoring 5 points lower than in 2020. Only 43% of U.S. fourth graders scored at or above proficient in reading, with stark disparities by race: 17% of Black students and 21% of Latino students reached proficiency compared to higher rates for White and Asian students. The new program challenges children to read 12 books of their choice between June 1 and September 5, 2025. They are instructed to track their progress using a reading log provided by the White House and participants must list book titles, authors, completion dates, and provide a brief reflection or drawing about their favorite book. Upon completion, children will receive a personalized certificate and a small prize, and are then entered into a drawing for a chaperoned trip to Washington, D.C. The literacy legacy Numerous literacy-related programs have been instituted by the White House throughout the nation’s history. Former First Lady Abigail Fillmore, First Lady of the United States from 1850 to 1853, did not establish a formal “literacy program” in the modern sense, but her most significant contribution to literacy was the creation of the first White House Library. A teacher since age 16, her initiative reflected her lifelong passion for education and reading, stemming from her belief in equal access to education for women. Former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt championed literacy through New Deal initiatives like the Works Progress Administration (WPA) library programs and bookmobiles, providing access to books for underserved communities, particularly during the Great Depression. As an avid reader and writer, Roosevelt used her “My Day” column and White House literary and poetry events to promote intellectual engagement and the value of reading. Her efforts, though not a single formal program, advanced literacy as a tool for empowerment, especially for poor, rural communities, and groups like African Americans and women. Perhaps the most famous FLOTUS literacy initiative was former First Lady Barbara Bush’s Foundation for Family Literacy, which to date has provided more than $110 million to create or expand family literacy programs throughout the country. Furthering the Bush family’s legacy, former First Lady Laura Bush initiated the National Book Festival in 2001, which still attracts more than 120,000 attendees each year. While not associated with the White House, Pizza Hut’s “BOOK IT!” program was created in 1984 by Arthur Gunther, then-president of Pizza Hut, in response to President Ronald Reagan’s call for businesses to support education. Inspired by his son Michael’s struggles with reading due to eye problems, Gunther collaborated with educators in Wichita, Kansas, to develop the program, which rewarded children with free Personal Pan Pizzas for meeting reading goals. Vance’s program also aims to promote mental health benefits like stress reduction through reading, as supported by Baylor College of Medicine research. The challenge is designed to be accessible nationwide, with schools and libraries expected to support its rollout. TOP STORIES Second Lady Vance launches reading initiative to combat abysmal literacy rates Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat LATEST EPISODES Mom-Turned-Activist takes on California’s vaccine laws in explosive court battle Tariffs, Treachery & the CCP: Rep. Moore puts his foot down to loosen China’s strategic grip on America Phil Kerpen on the clash up on Capitol Hill: Will Trump’s ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’ survive the Senate? Fight Club-Secret Service Edition: What went down at Obama’s home? Susan Crabtree’s reporting tells all Ghost-Signed Green Agenda? Watchdog Exec says Biden may not have authorized key executive orders RELATED ARTICLES Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ Energy group says Biden had no knowledge of climate change EOs, doubt validity of autopen use Trump accuses China of violating ‘fast’ trade deal he made to save country’s economy White House to send DOGE rescissions package to Capitol Hill: Report Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ major step in dismantling the regulatory state with REINS Act Despite decades of Democrat health initiatives, Americans are sicker than ever

Articles, Federal Agencies, Government

Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program

Articles / Federal Agencies / Government Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program After 15 years, Noem’s action puts an end to a program that cost an estimated $3 billion to taxpayers while potentially violating their privacy. By: On Thursday, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced via social media that the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) is ending the pricey and oft-politicized Quiet Skies program. “Today, I’m announcing TSA is ending the Quiet Skies Program, which since its existence has failed to stop a SINGLE terrorist attack while costing US taxpayers roughly $200 million a year,” she wrote in a press release. The Quiet Skies program, an initiative that began in 2010 and was officially launched in 2012 by the TSA, has sparked debate over its secretive monitoring of domestic air travelers deemed to be potential security risks. Originally intended to identify and track individuals who may pose threats to aviation, the program relied on behavioral analysis and data collection, often without passengers’ knowledge. Critics have long argued it raised privacy concerns and lacked transparency, while supporters have claimed it was a vital tool for ensuring safety in an era of evolving security challenges. Agency used program as political tool Noem went on to say, “DHS and TSA have uncovered documents, correspondence, and timelines that clearly highlight the inconsistent application of Quiet Skies. The program, under the guise of “national security,” was used to target political opponents and benefit political allies of the Biden Administration.” Noem also said that she is calling for a full Congressional investigation to examine corruption within the program. Perhaps the most well-known case is that of Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard, a decorated Army Reserve veteran who served in Iraq and Kuwait, and was later elected to the House of Representatives from Hawaii, was placed on the program’s watchlist in July 2024, prompting widespread controversy over allegations of political retaliation. Gabbard said on X that “I was put on a secret terror watch list after I publicly criticized [Kamala Harris]. No one will be safe from political retaliation under a Harris administration. I put my life on the line for this country. Now the government calls me a terror threat.” Both she and her husband, Abraham Williams, faced extensive screenings, with boarding passes marked “SSSS” for Secondary Security Screening Selection, which lasted up to 45 minutes per flight. Gabbard publicly condemned the surveillance, stating it caused her to “always be looking over my shoulder,” and described it as a betrayal of her 21-year military service. The TSA told Newsweek that the Quiet Skies program “is not a terrorist watchlist, [it] uses a risk-based approach to identify passengers and apply enhanced security measures on some domestic and outbound international flights.” Gabbard had been a frequent and vocal critic of the Biden administration and former Vice President Kamala Harris, and claimed her inclusion was a direct response to a July 22, 2024, Fox News interview during which she warned against Harris’ leadership, labeling it an act of “political retaliation.” Whistleblowers from the Federal Air Marshal Service confirmed her placement on the list, sparking outrage among Republican lawmakers and raising concerns about the program’s misuse to target individuals based on political views rather than legitimate security threats. Following Noem’s announcement, DNI Gabbard added in another ‘X’ post: “The Quiet Skies program has been used for nearly two decades to target and surveil everyday Americans, violating our constitutional rights and civil liberties, targeting political opponents, and costing taxpayers approximately $200 million per year, all while failing to stop a single terrorist.” Program used for political favors as well While many are aware of the program being used as a weapon, a June 4 press release from the DHS discloses how the program was abused in the other direction, namely, as a political favor: “Discovered documents, correspondence, and timelines clearly highlight the Biden’s inconsistent application of Silent Partners Quiet Skies and watchlisting programs, circumventing security policies to benefit politically aligned friends and family at the expense of the American people.” According to the timeline laid out by the DHS, in 2023, William “Billy” Shaheen, the husband of Senator Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., was flagged twice as a “Co-Traveler with a Known or Suspected Terrorist” (KST) on flights between Boston and D.C. According to the DHS, after Shaheen was flagged the second time, his wife, Senator Shaheen, met with then-Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) top officer David Pekoske about her husband being on a watchlist. Within several days of the meeting, Shaheen was then approved by TSA to be added to the Secure Flight Exclusion List. The DHS explained that “This means that Shaheen was excluded from any future TSA Random Selectee designation, and Rules-based Selectee designation, such as Quiet Skies, Association Based Rule Selectee designation, or Silent Partner Selectee designation.” Criticism of the Quiet Skies program also came from the Air Marshalls themselves, who were integral to the program’s operations. In messages communicated to the Boston Globe in 2018, they expressed misgivings, arguing that the program wasted resources and distracted from legitimate airborne threats. The lack of oversight and reliance on subjective criteria, like behavioral checklists, further undermined its credibility. Air Marshals reportedly told The Globe that the program has them tasked with shadowing travelers who appear to pose no real threat — a businesswoman who happened to have traveled through a Mideast hot spot; a Southwest Airlines flight attendant, and ironically, a fellow federal law enforcement officer. TOP STORIES Weaponized sugar pill? Homeland ends controversial and costly Quiet Skies domestic spying program Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ LATEST EPISODES Mom-Turned-Activist takes on California’s vaccine laws in explosive court battle Tariffs, Treachery & the CCP: Rep. Moore puts his foot down to loosen China’s strategic grip on America Phil Kerpen on the clash up on Capitol Hill: Will

Articles, Government, White House

Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories

Articles / Government / White House Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Leaving the distraction of Thursday’s highly public sparring with former DOGE chief Elon Musk behind, Trump is touting thus-far accomplishments that he campaigned on. By: President Trump appeared Friday to try to refocus Americans’ attention on his administration – away from his feud with Elon Musk to the economy. “Prices are down, income is up, our Border is closed, gasoline is CHEAP, inflation is DEAD — Our Country is BOOMING! Companies are pouring into America like never before,” he posted Friday on Truth Social. An hour later, Trump posted again saying, “AMERICA IS HOT! SIX MONTHS AGO IT WAS COLD AS ICE! BORDER IS CLOSED, PRICES ARE DOWN. WAGES ARE UP!” The posts come one day after a mix of public insults and social media posts by both Trump and Musk, who backed Trump’s winning 2024 presidential campaign, then joined his administration to lead its Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Trump also told ABC News and CNN on Friday that he was not interested in making up with Musk. On Thursday, during a state visit by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump spoke about the budget reconciliation package which the House passed, then sent to the Senate. Trump responded to a question about Elon Musk’s criticism of the budget reconciliation bill, referred to as the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” Trump expressed surprise and disappointment, stating, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” He stated that Musk was aware of the bill’s details and said, “Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody and he had no problem with it” until after leaving his role in the administration. Trump suggested Musk’s criticism stemmed from the bill’s revocation of electric vehicle mandates, noting, “He’s upset because we took away the EV mandate.” He also mentioned rejecting Musk’s pick to lead NASA. Trump defended the bill, calling it “one of the greatest bills ever presented to Congress” and emphasizing his intent to “fix” the issues raised, as stated on Truth Social. Musk responds in a series of X posts including one in which he said Trump is in the Jeffrey Epstein files “that is the real reason they have not been made public.” Musk also briefly threatened to decommission SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft before retracting the statement. TOP STORIES Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ Energy group says Biden had no knowledge of climate change EOs, doubt validity of autopen use LATEST EPISODES Mom-Turned-Activist takes on California’s vaccine laws in explosive court battle Tariffs, Treachery & the CCP: Rep. Moore puts his foot down to loosen China’s strategic grip on America Phil Kerpen on the clash up on Capitol Hill: Will Trump’s ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’ survive the Senate? Fight Club-Secret Service Edition: What went down at Obama’s home? Susan Crabtree’s reporting tells all Ghost-Signed Green Agenda? Watchdog Exec says Biden may not have authorized key executive orders RELATED ARTICLES Trump moves on from Musk rift, touts agenda victories Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ Energy group says Biden had no knowledge of climate change EOs, doubt validity of autopen use Trump accuses China of violating ‘fast’ trade deal he made to save country’s economy White House to send DOGE rescissions package to Capitol Hill: Report Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ major step in dismantling the regulatory state with REINS Act Despite decades of Democrat health initiatives, Americans are sicker than ever Trump‘s ‘big, beautiful bill’ delivers decades-long conservative wish list, if it outlasts bickering

America, Articles, Culture, Extremism

Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’

America / Articles / Government / White House Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ Has “Woke” worn out its welcome? After President Trump’s 2024 election, wokeness across industries has started to wane. As such, companies are scaling down or eliminating public and financial support of Pride Month-related activities and initiatives. By: After four years of failed social engineering, now it would appear that the United States is decidedly less “pride”-ful than in previous years, according to a look at currents in polling, politics, culture and business. “Get woke, go broke” became an everyday phrase in 2023 during the Bud Light/Dylan Mulvaney scandal. Mulvaney, a biological male who presents as female, promoted the beer brand in an Instagram video highlighting their sponsorship of March Madness. Prior to and following that marketing disaster, other companies faced similar backlash from customers who wanted these organizations to simply conduct business, provide goods and services, and not pander to the “diversity, equity, inclusion” agenda. For its part, Anheuser-Busch InBev, the parent company that owns the Bud Light brand in North America, reportedly saw revenues drop by about $1.4 billion in 2023, primarily due to a decline in Bud Light sales in the United States after the product was eschewed by consumers and mocked widely for their business relations with Mulvaney. Corporations walking back “woke” marketing Despite this year marking the tenth anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court case which legalized gay marriage, Pride events across the country are now facing funding shortfalls due to businesses and corporations scaling back or outright eliminating their sponsorship of such events. San Francisco Pride faces a $200,000 shortfall, and NYC Pride is down $750,000 in funding from 2024, The Guardian reported. A 2025 Gravity Research survey found a 60% drop in corporate Pride engagement from 2023 to 2024, with 39% of companies scaling back further in 2025. Major brand names such as Mastercard, Citi, Pepsi, Nissan and PwC have pulled their sponsorship of NYC Pride, one of the largest Pride events in the world. Brands like Anheuser-Busch and Target have reduced their Pride sponsorships, citing economic concerns or backlash from conservative groups. This suggests corporations perceive a risk in identifying too closely with the movement, possibly reflecting fatigue among certain consumer bases. Political pushback In January, the Trump administration implemented a “One Flag Policy” that bans the display of Pride flags, along with other non-U.S. flags like Black Lives Matter flags, at U.S. embassies and State Department facilities around the world. The policy, reportedly issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio on January 21, 2025, mandates that only the American flag, with exceptions for the Prisoner of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) and Wrongful Detainees flags, can be flown or displayed at these facilities. Recent legislation, like Utah’s Pride flag ban, points to a segment of Americans—often aligned with conservative politics—who oppose the elevation of “pride” over traditional values, particularly the hot-button issues that come up: transgender athletes, tampon dispensers being required in high school boys’ bathrooms, and the infamous “Drag Queen Story Time” programs launched by public libraries and schools. Importantly, the ban also targets other flags, including political flags that support certain candidates or parties, like President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” flags. The buildings can still fly the United States flag, the Utah state flag and military flags. This could be interpreted as a form of cultural fatigue or, instead, a rejection of normalizing a lifestyle many sections of the public find extreme or offensive. The Biden administration publicly embraced LGBTQ+ characters and media influencers, inviting them to visit the White House. Military returning to traditional values On January 27, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness,” which reinstates and expands a policy from his first term, banning transgender people from enlisting and serving openly in the military. The order directs the Department of Defense to update its medical standards to disqualify individuals with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria or a history of gender transition, arguing that such conditions are inconsistent with military readiness, cohesion, and discipline. It also prohibits the use of pronouns that do not align with an individual’s sex assigned at birth and bans sex-change surgery for service members. Additionally, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has ordered the United States Navy to rename its USNS Harvey Milk, an oil ship named after the first openly gay man elected to public office in California. Sports marketing takes notice and dials it down As of the publication of this article, nine NFL (National Football League) teams have declined to issue Pride Month proclamations. The Texas Rangers baseball team have also not issued a proclamation regarding Pride. Many sports enterprises have used social media to post fairly generic “celebrations” of “pride”, but they are far less spendy than the in-person festivities and galas of years past. As for this year, NASCAR — the stock car racing body estimated to be worth at least $3 billion, announced that they would post “Pride Month” messages on social media, but may have even backed away from that. In 2023, the Los Angeles Dodgers met with intense backlash from their fans for allowing a queer and trans drag group called the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” to perform at the team’s Pride Night. The team hastily scheduled a Christian Faith and Family Night that drew thousands of attendees. GLAAD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) did not respond to a request for comment as of the publication of this article. TOP STORIES Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ Energy group says Biden had no knowledge of climate change EOs, doubt validity of autopen use Trump accuses China of violating ‘fast’ trade deal he made to save country’s economy LATEST EPISODES Tariffs, Treachery & the CCP: Rep. Moore puts his foot down to loosen China’s strategic grip on America Phil Kerpen on the clash up on Capitol Hill: Will Trump’s ‘One

America, Articles, Religion, Security

Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat

America / Articles / Religion / Security Amanda Head presses White House on anti-semitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat On Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Amanda Head was selected to sit in the ‘new media’ seat at the White House Press Briefing hosted by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Head asked two questions relating to the relevant news of the day. By: Today at the White House Press Briefing, Furthermore Podcast Host and Investigative Journalist Amanda Head joined the White House Press Corp in the “new media” seat, posing two bold questions to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Head pressed the Trump Administration on its response to rising antisemitic violence, as well as the controversial Democrat-led state restrictions on religious vaccine exemptions, especially for school aged children. Amanda opened by referencing a disturbing wave of violent incidents, including the deadly stabbing of Israeli embassy staff, the arson at Pennsylvania’s governor’s mansion while the state’s Jewish governor was inside, and the recent attack in Boulder, Colorado. “Does the president consider this domestic terrorism,” she asked, “and as such, are there official alerts to law enforcement, task forces, things like that?” Press Secretary Leavitt confirmed the Administration does consider such acts as terrorism, stating that, “this Administration has done more to combat that violence than any administration in history.” She added that President Trump “will stand up for Americans of all religions” and is committed to supporting policy efforts aimed at protecting Jewish Americans. Head’s second question tackled another growing concern for families: the issue of religious exemptions for childhood vaccines. Citing the February creation of a federal commission to reexamine the vaccine schedule, Head noted that several states, including California, Connecticut, and Maine still ban religious exemptions not only for school attendance, but for participation in sports and extracurriculars. “What the President wants to see [are] religious exemptions allowed across all 50 states,” Head stated, asking how enforcement would be handled, particularly in liberally defiant states like California. Leavitt responded, “The President supports religious exemptions for families when it comes to vaccinations.” She said this Administration would look into the specific state cases mentioned and evaluate potential executive actions. Amanda Head’s line of questioning drew praise online for pressing the White House on issues often overlooked in corporate media coverage. Both moments will be featured and analyzed in depth in the next episode of Furthermore with Amanda Head, which will be published on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. You can subscribe to Furthermore with Amanda Head Podcast on your favorite platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, amongst the other major streaming platforms. Be sure to also follow Amanda Head and the Furthermore Podcast accounts on X (formerly Twitter) for updates and behind-the-scenes coverage at @AmandaHead or @FurthermorePod. TOP STORIES Amanda Head presses Trump White House on anti-semitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat Energy group says Biden had no knowledge of climate change EOs, doubt validity of autopen use Trump accuses China of violating ‘fast’ trade deal he made to save country’s economy White House to send DOGE rescissions package to Capitol Hill: Report Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ major step in dismantling the regulatory state with REINS Act LATEST EPISODES Phil Kerpen on the clash up on Capitol Hill: Will Trump’s ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’ survive the Senate? Fight Club-Secret Service Edition: What went down at Obama’s home? Susan Crabtree’s reporting tells all Ghost-Signed Green Agenda? Watchdog Exec says Biden may not have authorized key executive orders The Price of Freedom: Honoring Heroes & Defending America with Jimmy Graham on Memorial Day Rep. Grothman voted for Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill,’ blasted Biden’s open border failures & welfare bloat RELATED ARTICLES Amanda Head presses Trump White House on anti-semitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat Energy group says Biden had no knowledge of climate change EOs, doubt validity of autopen use Trump accuses China of violating ‘fast’ trade deal he made to save country’s economy White House to send DOGE rescissions package to Capitol Hill: Report Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ major step in dismantling the regulatory state with REINS Act Despite decades of Democrat health initiatives, Americans are sicker than ever Trump‘s ‘big, beautiful bill’ delivers decades-long conservative wish list, if it outlasts bickering Trump: Putin call went ‘very well’, negotiations to start ‘immediately’ Trump to lift Syria sanctions, give country a ‘chance at peace’ Trump signs historic agreements with Saudi Prince

Scroll to Top