BREAKING NEWS

BREAKING NEWS

Extremism

America, Articles, Extremism

Alarming number of Americans, Democrats expect a politically violent future

America / Articles / Extremism Alarming number of Americans, Democrats expect a politically violent future A majority of Americans believe political violence will increase as a starling uptick. Others hold the belief that it is justified. The acceptability of such justifications appear to be divided by party lines, according to polling. By: On Monday, Politico and Public First released their poll’s findings of 2,051 U.S. adults, conducted Oct. 18-21, which showed that 55% of Americans think political violence will ramp up in the coming years. This worry cuts across all groups, with most people from different genders, ages, parties, and education levels feeling the same. Democrats and older respondents seem especially on edge about it, likely fueled by recent heated elections, social divides and acts like the assassination of Charlie Kirk in September. Opinions on the presidency tie into fears of violence, with 76% of those who strongly dislike the office expecting more trouble, the poll says. Just 15% in that group think it’ll drop instead. The poll points to widespread nerves about rising tensions, showing splits that go beyond usual party fights and hinting at deeper concerns over trust in government and media echo chambers. Overall, only a small slice of respondents—around 8%—believe violence will actually decrease, leaving little room for optimism. This comes amid real events like assassination attempts and protests that have rattled the country lately. Legislators are taking notice Those numbers comport with comments from veteran lawmakers from both parties, who describe a sharp rise in political violence since they first entered Congress. They blame the surge on a number of factors, including social media, deepening partisan divisions and inflammatory language that turns opponents into targets. Long-serving members recalled to NOTUS.org an earlier time of civility where public town halls required no security details, but now many skip such events to avoid risks, limiting direct contact with voters. Recent attacks underscore the threats, including: The assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, Intentional arson at the Democratic Pennsylvania’s governor’s residence, Multiple assassination attempts of President Donald Trump, and The killing of a Minnesota legislator who rejected a Democrat motion to provide taxpayer-funded healthcare to illegal aliens. Security funding boosted after attacks on ICE Lawmakers report exponential jumps in death threats, as Congress has boosted security funding and added metal detectors. In July 2025, members of an Antifa-affiliated cell launched an armed ambush on an ICE detention center in Alvarado, Texas, firing on officers and wounding one in the neck during a coordinated attack involving over 50 weapons. Federal prosecutors later charged two suspects with terrorism, marking the first such case under President Trump’s designation of Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization. Throughout the summer, Antifa militants in Portland, Oregon, escalated protests against ICE facilities with incendiary devices, projectiles and assaults on federal agents, prompting a surge in National Guard deployments. These incidents prompted Trump’s September executive order cracking down on the group, amid warnings from experts that left-wing extremism, while rising, remains less lethal than right-wing threats overall. More than half identifying as left-of-center “somewhat” justify political murder: Poll says A study released in the spring by the Network Contagion Research Institute and Rutgers University revealed that 55% of participants identifying as left-of-center viewed the assassination of President Trump as at least somewhat justifiable. Nearly half—48%—expressed similar sentiments toward Elon Musk. Additionally, 40% of all respondents deemed it somewhat acceptable to vandalize a Tesla dealership as a form of protest, a view shared by almost 60% of those on the left. Those numbers have shifted drastically. A 2017 YouGov poll found that only 8% of Democrats and Republicans said political violence is “at least a little bit justified.” Asked a slightly different way in 2020, that same demographic shrugged to 36% among Republicans and 33% among Democrats. TOP STORIES Alarming number of Americans, Democrats expect a politically violent future White House trying to sort out what Biden and Blinken ignored in Nigerian war on Christians In off-year elections, Republicans ignored major Trump wins that could’ve changed the night EPA chief says ‘the sky is the limit’ with Trump’s diplomatic deals on strategic minerals SNAP program rife with fraud, disparity and health issues for participants, government agencies say LATEST EPISODES Trump Meets Syria’s Al-Sharaa as Faith Leaders Demand Action on Religious Persecution Dr. Drew: ‘Ordinary misery is good, it builds resiliency,’ yet Americans are ‘intolerant’ to it Alfredo Ortiz: ‘If we can’t band together over key Main Street issues, we face a blue wave next year’ Housing First, Results Last: Why California’s Homelessness Crisis Keeps Growing Mark Finchem reacts to being named in Arctic Frost: ‘wanting fair elections made me a nat’l security threat?’ RELATED ARTICLES Alarming number of Americans, Democrats expect a politically violent future White House trying to sort out what Biden and Blinken ignored in Nigerian war on Christians In off-year elections, Republicans ignored major Trump wins that could’ve changed the night EPA chief says ‘the sky is the limit’ with Trump’s diplomatic deals on strategic minerals SNAP program rife with fraud, disparity and health issues for participants, government agencies say ‘No Kings’ protesters silent when Democrats rule as monarch Democrats panic over redistricting numbers with pivotal SCOTUS decision looming DOGE says that it has created $210 billion in taxpayer savings Top White House official hints Antifa could soon be designated foreign terror group: ‘Stay tuned’ Despite appearances, the NFL still pays lip service to ‘woke’ crowd

America, Articles, Extremism

‘No Kings’ protesters silent when Democrats rule as monarch

America / Articles / Extremism ‘No Kings’ protesters silent when Democrats rule as monarch A matter of projection: When anyone starts bleating about “dictatorship” they have to start with defining “regal” or “kinglike” actions, and look at the activity — and actions — of recent presidents to get a sense of perspective. By: Aseries of “No Kings” protests are touted to take place again on Saturday, representing yet another wave of organized objection from left-wing activists using the government shutdown to fill streets across the country. The same people aren’t so quick — or capable — of explaining away why they sat silent while President Joe Biden engaged in activities that clearly exceeded his executive authority. These protest gatherings, organized by groups like Indivisible and various labor unions, are working from a narrative of using patriotic rhetoric and symbolism to criticize President Donald Trump as a would-be monarch, ignoring how their history and demands for unchecked federal spending and censorship echo the very authoritarianism they decry. Executive Overreach on Student Loan Forgiveness Joe Biden’s push for widespread student loan forgiveness by fiat through executive action was seen by many as a king-like act, bypassing Congress and ignoring Supreme Court precedents to unilaterally erase billions in debt. Critics argued the move treated the executive branch as an unchecked sovereign, with edicts that exacerbated economic burdens on everyday Americans without approval from Congress. Furthermore, Biden attempted to forgive student loans from multiple programs by bypassing Congress altogether. Biden attempted to forgive — on his signature alone — up to $20,000 in federal student loan debt for Pell Grant recipients and up to $10,000 for other borrowers earning less than $125,000 annually, using authority under the HEROES Act. The 2022 plan aimed to cancel roughly $400 billion in debt but was struck down by the United States Supreme Court in 2023 for exceeding executive authority. In what appeared to be further monarchical behavior in ignoring legal boundaries, Biden later pushed for alternative relief through the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, which faced similar legal challenges. Unilateral Immigration Enforcement Policies, Energy policies Biden’s early executive orders, like the 100-day deportation moratorium, were received by the same people complaining about Trump’s actions as regal decrees that, again, bypassed Congress’s role in establishing immigration policy. By selectively enforcing laws and expanding protections for illegal migrants, it appeared to be acting like a sovereign, granting sanctuary based on personal whim rather than statutory fidelity. This approach sparked border surges in the millions, the fallout of which the Trump administration is now dealing. A complicating result of Biden’s border crisis is currently playing out through the government shutdown as Democrats are pushing for $1.5 trillion in additional spending, including healthcare funding for illegal migrants who came into the country during the Biden administration, but were unilaterally deemed asylum-seekers. Biden’s first-day cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline and pause on new federal oil and gas leases were decried by conservative voices as monarchical edicts that disrupted industries without stakeholder or congressional input. These unilateral moves, framed as climate imperatives by the administration at the behest of the climate-change lobby, resembled a king’s abrupt dissolution of ventures and interests deemed unfit or misaligned with the Biden agenda. The resulting economic fallout reinforced perceptions that Biden ruled by proclamation, imposing these green mandates that had dire effects on the U.S. economy. What the protests may look like Americans can expect to see thousands take to the streets in locations across all 50 states, turning peaceful marches into chaotic spectacles that burden local law enforcement and disrupt everyday Americans trying to navigate traffic and get to work on a Saturday. House Speaker Mike Johnson called it a “Hate America” rally packed with radicals under the Antifa banner and pro-Hamas agitators, whose goal doesn’t appear to be democracy but sowing division to pressure Republicans into caving on shutdown talks. Previous ‘No Kings’ protests fizzled this summer, leaving only littered parks in their wake and few tangible policy results. TOP STORIES ‘No Kings’ protesters silent when Democrats rule as monarch Democrats panic over redistricting numbers with pivotal SCOTUS decision looming DOGE says that it has created $210 billion in taxpayer savings Top White House official hints Antifa could soon be designated foreign terror group: ‘Stay tuned’ Despite appearances, the NFL still pays lip service to ‘woke’ crowd LATEST EPISODES Inside Operation Summer Heat: FBI Director Kash Patel on Crime, Counterintelligence & Accountability DOJ vs. Gun Owners: Why AG Pam Bondi Must Stop Fighting the Second Amendment From Columbus to Trump: How America’s Heritage Fuels Newfound Patriotism Virginia Lt. Gov. GOP Nominee: Jay Jones ‘revealed the violence problem that’s prevalent in Democrat Party’ Ex-US Attorney Bud Cummins: DOJ credibility ‘annihilated’ by Comey, McCabe, Obama-era elites, indictment is justified RELATED ARTICLES ‘No Kings’ protesters silent when Democrats rule as monarch Democrats panic over redistricting numbers with pivotal SCOTUS decision looming DOGE says that it has created $210 billion in taxpayer savings Top White House official hints Antifa could soon be designated foreign terror group: ‘Stay tuned’ Despite appearances, the NFL still pays lip service to ‘woke’ crowd WH Press Secretary Leavitt says Democrats’ language attacking ICE is ‘despicable’ How Trump can navigate budget negotiations to avert government shutdown Convention of States effort surges as Trump aims at shrinking size, scope of federal government Fed rate cut makes minimal immediate impact, but long-term effects in question Trump visits a U.K. facing internal social, political turmoil with message of freedom, friendship

America, Articles, Extremism, Local, Politics & Policy

Texas firefighters on Austin fire chief: ‘dereliction of duty’ cost lives

America / Articles / Extremism / Local / Politics & Policy Texas firefighters on Austin fire chief: ‘dereliction of duty’ cost lives As the death toll from the central Texas floods surpasses 120 with 170 still missing, Austin’s fire chief is in the crosshairs of firefighters who claim his refusal to respond and assist in the rescue effort cost lives. By: The fire chief in Austin, Texas, a city known as a liberal hipster hub in a deep red state, is under sharp scrutiny for refusing to provide assistance in the days preceding the catastrophic and deadly central Texas floods last weekend. Austin Fire Department chief Joel Baker was the subject of scorn by his own firefighters’ union, the Austin Firefighters Association, which posted scathing remarks on social media about Baker during and in the aftermath of the floods that thus far have taken 121 lives, many of them children, with at least 170 people still missing. “It brings the Austin Firefighters no pleasure to report to the community that the Austin Fire Chief DENIED the deployment of Austin firefighters to Kerrville until very late into the event (so today!), with the exception of only 3 AFD rescue swimmers who helped staff helo teams (which still were NOT deployed until the afternoon of the 4th),” the post stated. “Helo teams” is jargon for specialized helicopter rescue units, specializing in emergency response capabilities for water-related emergencies. All about money allegedly owed to the city? The post goes on to explain that Austin’s Firefighter Special Operations teams are trained for specific challenges, just like the Hill Country floods where swift water rescue is required. The union’s post goes on to place blame squarely on Baker’s shoulders: “It is absolutely outrageous that the Austin Fire Chief, Joel G. Baker, would not allow highly trained firefighters from Austin to respond to Kerrville. Because of this egregious dereliction of duty, LIVES WERE VERY LIKELY LOST BECAUSE OF CHIEF BAKER’S DECISION!” According to the Facebook post, requests for assistance came from the state of Texas on July 2, two days prior to the floods, and another request on July 3, both of which were denied by Baker. “It is unforgivable that a fire chief would NOT allow his firefighters to answer the call to save lives,” the post continued. The firefighters also asked rhetorically: “Why would Fire Chief Joel G. Baker do this, you may ask? It was a misguided attempt to save money. I say “misguided” because the fire department is fully reimbursed by the state to deploy. I explained the reimbursement process to Chief Baker last week, and he failed to understand this very simple concept.” The criticism came after the Austin Fire Department announced it would not deploy personnel outside of Austin because of a budget shortfall, including “something like $800,000 in outstanding reimbursements owed to AFD by the State of Texas,” according to local station KXAN-TV. The TV station also reported that Baker said he issued the pause on deployments due to “internal issues” over the state’s ability to reimburse the department, insisting that budget constraints had “nothing” to do with his decision-making. Other cities answered the call CBS News reported that fire and rescue departments from North Texas heeded the call to assist: Fort Worth Fire Department sent two teams and Dallas Fire-Rescue deployed a water squad of six people. Other departments in the surrounding area also sent support: Mountain Home Fire Department, Ingram Volunteer Fire Department, Denton Fire Department, Houston Fire Department, and Galveston Fire Department were actively involved. Texas A&M Forest Service deployed Texas Intrastate Fire Mutual Aid System strike teams to assist local fire departments, indicating a broader network of fire service involvement. Surrounding states also sent support: Shreveport, Louisiana, and Memphis, Tennessee deployed teams to contribute to the efforts. Additionally, international teams also came to aid in the search and rescue efforts: a team of 13 firefighters from Ciudad Acuña, Mexico, through Fundación 911, assisted in Kerr County. The city comes to Baker’s defense The Austin Fire Department responded to the allegations by telling the local Fox television affiliate that “The decision about how to allocate resources to help our fellow Texans is not a simple one. It requires communication from public safety partners on the ground to ensure we are providing resources and personnel when, where and how they are most needed.” “The Austin Fire Department must also prioritize having sufficient resources in our own community given the unpredictability of this weekend’s storms and the risk for catastrophic flooding in our immediate area,” the department said. Austin City Manager T.C. Broadnax issued a statement addressing the accusations, saying “It is disappointing that the Firefighters Association would make these allegations and consider such a vote, especially while these communities continue to grieve and recover.” “It’s even more disheartening how quickly the Association’s claims spread, because so many people are ready to place blame. The City of Austin, and the Austin Fire Department in particular, have a very long track record of supporting and sending aid to neighboring communities in need,” he continued. “No confidence” vote “To be clear, I continue to have confidence in Chief Baker and remain committed to listening and working with both the Chief and the Fire Association to ensure that the Austin Fire Department is able to continue supporting our neighbors while protecting our local community,” the City Manager added. The union held an “emergency” meeting Tuesday, voting unanimously to hold a vote of no confidence in Baker, The New York Post reported.  “We could’ve made a difference, and we were forced to stand down and lives were lost,” the union said. Donations supporting relief and rebuilding efforts after the flood are being collected, and the local Fox affiliate has created a web page in conjunction with The Community Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public charity serving the Texas Hill Country. TOP STORIES Growing tariff revenues, court rulings raise hopes Trump could put U.S. on path to balanced budget Texas firefighters on Austin fire chief: ‘dereliction of duty’ cost lives Texas Land

America, Articles, Culture, Extremism

Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’

America / Articles / Government / White House Culture, sports and business worlds all dialing back support of ‘Pride Month’ Has “Woke” worn out its welcome? After President Trump’s 2024 election, wokeness across industries has started to wane. As such, companies are scaling down or eliminating public and financial support of Pride Month-related activities and initiatives. By: After four years of failed social engineering, now it would appear that the United States is decidedly less “pride”-ful than in previous years, according to a look at currents in polling, politics, culture and business. “Get woke, go broke” became an everyday phrase in 2023 during the Bud Light/Dylan Mulvaney scandal. Mulvaney, a biological male who presents as female, promoted the beer brand in an Instagram video highlighting their sponsorship of March Madness. Prior to and following that marketing disaster, other companies faced similar backlash from customers who wanted these organizations to simply conduct business, provide goods and services, and not pander to the “diversity, equity, inclusion” agenda. For its part, Anheuser-Busch InBev, the parent company that owns the Bud Light brand in North America, reportedly saw revenues drop by about $1.4 billion in 2023, primarily due to a decline in Bud Light sales in the United States after the product was eschewed by consumers and mocked widely for their business relations with Mulvaney. Corporations walking back “woke” marketing Despite this year marking the tenth anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court case which legalized gay marriage, Pride events across the country are now facing funding shortfalls due to businesses and corporations scaling back or outright eliminating their sponsorship of such events. San Francisco Pride faces a $200,000 shortfall, and NYC Pride is down $750,000 in funding from 2024, The Guardian reported. A 2025 Gravity Research survey found a 60% drop in corporate Pride engagement from 2023 to 2024, with 39% of companies scaling back further in 2025. Major brand names such as Mastercard, Citi, Pepsi, Nissan and PwC have pulled their sponsorship of NYC Pride, one of the largest Pride events in the world. Brands like Anheuser-Busch and Target have reduced their Pride sponsorships, citing economic concerns or backlash from conservative groups. This suggests corporations perceive a risk in identifying too closely with the movement, possibly reflecting fatigue among certain consumer bases. Political pushback In January, the Trump administration implemented a “One Flag Policy” that bans the display of Pride flags, along with other non-U.S. flags like Black Lives Matter flags, at U.S. embassies and State Department facilities around the world. The policy, reportedly issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio on January 21, 2025, mandates that only the American flag, with exceptions for the Prisoner of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) and Wrongful Detainees flags, can be flown or displayed at these facilities. Recent legislation, like Utah’s Pride flag ban, points to a segment of Americans—often aligned with conservative politics—who oppose the elevation of “pride” over traditional values, particularly the hot-button issues that come up: transgender athletes, tampon dispensers being required in high school boys’ bathrooms, and the infamous “Drag Queen Story Time” programs launched by public libraries and schools. Importantly, the ban also targets other flags, including political flags that support certain candidates or parties, like President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” flags. The buildings can still fly the United States flag, the Utah state flag and military flags. This could be interpreted as a form of cultural fatigue or, instead, a rejection of normalizing a lifestyle many sections of the public find extreme or offensive. The Biden administration publicly embraced LGBTQ+ characters and media influencers, inviting them to visit the White House. Military returning to traditional values On January 27, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness,” which reinstates and expands a policy from his first term, banning transgender people from enlisting and serving openly in the military. The order directs the Department of Defense to update its medical standards to disqualify individuals with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria or a history of gender transition, arguing that such conditions are inconsistent with military readiness, cohesion, and discipline. It also prohibits the use of pronouns that do not align with an individual’s sex assigned at birth and bans sex-change surgery for service members. Additionally, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has ordered the United States Navy to rename its USNS Harvey Milk, an oil ship named after the first openly gay man elected to public office in California. Sports marketing takes notice and dials it down As of the publication of this article, nine NFL (National Football League) teams have declined to issue Pride Month proclamations. The Texas Rangers baseball team have also not issued a proclamation regarding Pride. Many sports enterprises have used social media to post fairly generic “celebrations” of “pride”, but they are far less spendy than the in-person festivities and galas of years past. As for this year, NASCAR — the stock car racing body estimated to be worth at least $3 billion, announced that they would post “Pride Month” messages on social media, but may have even backed away from that. In 2023, the Los Angeles Dodgers met with intense backlash from their fans for allowing a queer and trans drag group called the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” to perform at the team’s Pride Night. The team hastily scheduled a Christian Faith and Family Night that drew thousands of attendees. GLAAD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) did not respond to a request for comment as of the publication of this article. TOP STORIES Amanda Head presses White House on antisemitic terrorism, vaccine religious exemptions in ‘new media’ seat White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ White House to Jewish Americans: ‘This president has your back’ Energy group says Biden had no knowledge of climate change EOs, doubt validity of autopen use Trump accuses China of violating ‘fast’ trade deal he made to save country’s economy LATEST EPISODES Tariffs, Treachery & the CCP: Rep. Moore puts his foot down to loosen China’s strategic grip on America Phil Kerpen on the clash up on Capitol Hill: Will Trump’s ‘One

Scroll to Top