BREAKING NEWS

BREAKING NEWS

Congress

Articles, Congress, Government, Politics & Policy, White House

Trump‘s ‘big, beautiful bill’ delivers decades-long conservative wish list, if it outlasts bickering

Articles / Congress / Government / Politics & Policy / White House Trump‘s ‘big, beautiful bill’ delivers decades-long conservative wish list, if it outlasts bickering The bill funds and codifies many of President’s priorities and could help GOP approval on Capitol Hill at a time when many voters aren’t pleased by lack of progress. By: The “One Big Beautiful Bill” that President Donald Trump personally lobbied Congress to pass Tuesday delivers on decades of conservative wishes, but first it must survive bickering over two very different issues: deductions for high-tax state voters and the size of spending cuts in an era of record debt. Speaker Mike Johnson was working feverishly Tuesday night to eliminate one of the roadblocks — demands to increase the State and Local Taxes (SALT) Deduction cap — while fiscal hawks were being pressed to trust that Trump and his DOGE-infused, regulation-busting team can deliver more than the $1.6 trillion in spending cuts the current legislation enacts over the next decade. A final push will require some conservatives to make a leap of faith, like Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Republican Study Committee, is taking. “Look as a conservative, I want to save as much money as I can, and we have pushed for that in the Republican Study Committee,” Pfluger told Just the News on Tuesday. “But the President was pretty clear that we’ve worked five or six months straight on this, and it is time to get it done. “That doesn’t mean that a guy like me doesn’t want more. Yes, of course I do. But I also want to govern, which means you don’t get 100% of everything you want every single time. You have to come back and do it again, and we will,” he said during an interview on the John Solomon Reports podcast. There were signs of progress Tuesday night as blue-state Republicans who want more than the legislation’s tripling of the SALT deduction (from its current $10,000 cap to $30,000) were negotiating with Johnson toward a deal. A tentative agreement was reportedly reached late Tuesday. Meanwhile, Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Col., told the Just The News, No Noise TV show, that conservative hawks were already making deeper cuts through the traditional appropriations process outside the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” and succeeding in lowering spending from the targets set for some programs in a budget blueprint passed just weeks ago. “I think we’ve already seen some of that happen already. In the reconciliation process, you actually have to pass the bill twice. The first time you pass the bill, you’re setting those top line numbers for how much either cuts or spending is going to occur under those committees of jurisdiction,” Evans explained. “But then when you come through and you actually build the policies to meet those top line numbers, there’s no mandate that you actually have to spend all of the money that you’re allocated.” Therefore, if this administration and Congress start treating congressional appropriations as ceilings, not floors, that will allow Trump to spend less when the job is done efficiently and for less money. Rep. Rudy Yakym, R-Ind., told Just The News that spending will likely be reduced again this summer and fall after the reconciliation bill passes in the form of clawbacks of prior approved spending. “He [Trump] can do that through rescission packages, which we would expect that he’ll be sending us some rescissions here sometime later on this year,” Yakym explained. Meanwhile, high-profile conservatives like House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan were imploring colleagues to appreciate and message to voters just how many conservative agenda items are stacked in the bill already, many which have been on wish lists for years or decades. “What I think we really need to be doing as Republicans, is talking about how good this bill is,” Jordan said on the Just the News, No Noise TV show Monday. “I mean, there’s a reason Democrats hate it. Democrats hate it because it’s all about Republican principles. “We’re the party that says cut taxes. We’re the party that says secure the border. We’re the party that says we should require work for able-bodied adults who are getting taxpayer money. This bill does all three of those,” he added. The White House sent out an email from the Office of Communications outlining specific reasons it feels Republicans in Congress must unite behind the funding package. At the top of the list of 20 reasons why sits Trump’s tax cuts, which would be the largest in history and an extra $5,000 on average for Americans through a double-digit decrease to their tax bill. It also includes Trump’s “No Tax On Tips” and “No Tax On Overtime” and “No Tax on Social Security” provisions. The list also prioritizes “Big, Beautiful Deportations,” permanently securing borders by making the largest border security investment in history. Much of that investment will be allocated to funding at least one million annual deportations of illegal immigrants. The immigration allocation also includes funding to finish Trump’s border wall, which began construction during Trump’s first term. It also empowers immigration authorities to carry out their duties with an additional workforce of about 10,000 new ICE personnel, 5,000 new customs officers, and 3,000 new Border Patrol agents. For border workers on the front lines, they’ll receive $10,000 bonuses. Trump has also been adamant that this bill, with his backing, will protect Medicaid by removing at least 1.4 million illegal migrants off the rolls, saving taxpayers’ money. Additionally, it requires able-bodied Americans to work if they receive benefits starting in January 2029. The bill, according to the White House, also “reverses the spending curse plaguing Washington, D.C.” and delivers the largest deficit reduction in nearly 30 years, amounting to $1.6 trillion in mandatory spending. This bill also reportedly puts an end to taxpayer-funded sex changes for minors. Under the Biden administration, Medicaid covered so-called “gender transition” procedures for minors. The provision in this bill reverses that. The legislation also allows for historic modernization and a complete overhaul to

Congress, Government

In sudden shift, Democrats take lead in generic election ballot as voters fret about finances

Congress / Government In sudden shift, Democrats take lead in generic election ballot as voters fret about finances The new poll shows bad news for Republicans heading into 2026 midterms. By: In a sudden swing, Democrats now enjoy a four-point lead over Republicans on the generic ballot, according to a new Napolitan News survey conducted by pollster Scott Rasmussen. Forty-eight percent of voters say they would now vote for the Democrat from their district, while 44% would vote for the Republican. When leaners are included in the survey, the Democratic lead increases to five points: 50% to 45%. The poll was conducted April 16 and represents a seven-point swing since the end of February, when the GOP held a two-point advantage (48% to 46%). In January, Republicans had a seven-point advantage (51% to 44%). The generic ballot concerns track with negativity among voters on Trump’s handling of the economy: on inflation, 41% approve of the president’s performance, while 59% disapprove. In March, 45% approved and 52% disapproved. Two months ago, 48% approved and 47% disapproved. “The decline in presidential approval on economic issues is tied to growing voter pessimism on their personal finances,” Rasmussen’s group explained. “That is likely the driving force in Democratic gains on the generic ballot.” If you want to read more of the latest by Amanda Head or the team of world class journalists at Just The News, feel free to read or subscribe by visiting JustTheNews.com today. TOP STORIES Federal workers are waging a resistance against Trump agenda. It’s captured in videos and polling In sudden shift, Democrats take lead in generic election ballot as voters fret about finances Trump physical results released, he ‘remains in excellent health,’ doctor says White House projects confidence in tariff plan, points to ‘very good’ progress White House replaces historic ‘Jackson Magnolia’ with descendant sapling LATEST EPISODES Rep. Huizenga says Trump’s directness brings ‘clarity’ to diplomacy, teases US Senate run to expand majority Rep. Andy Biggs targets judicial bias & country singer John Rich sounds alarm on child exploitation crisis Sexually explicit books in schools & food dyes are latest issues in parental rights fight, Tiffany Justice digs in Father Frank Pavone reacts to Pope Francis’ death, endorses Trump’s pick for Vatican Ambassador Middle East expert says US, Israel must tell a very weak Iran: ‘dismantle nuclear program or pay ultimate price’ RELATED ARTICLES Federal workers are waging a resistance against Trump agenda. It’s captured in videos and polling Trump physical results released, he ‘remains in excellent health,’ doctor says White House projects confidence in tariff plan, points to ‘very good’ progress White House replaces historic ‘Jackson Magnolia’ with descendant sapling Trump imposes historic 10% tariffs against most nations, vows to ‘supercharge’ economy Did NPR, PBS write their own obituaries before Congress? Some lawmakers think yes Barn Berning across America: AOC, Bernie Sanders take their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour national Second Amendment leaders press DOGE to stop health agencies’ gun control studies As ceasefire ends, Israeli strikes in Gaza targeted Hamas officials Angry democrats gone wild

Articles, Congress, Government

Barn Berning across America: AOC, Bernie Sanders take their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour national

Articles / Congress / Government Barn Berning across America: AOC, Bernie Sanders take their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour national The irony of Representative AOC and Senator Bernie Sanders traversing across the nation on their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour is almost too hypocritical to handle. By: New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (“AOC”) and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders are crusading against the wealthy on their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour and some politicos are calling out the irony. At one of their latest tour stops in Denver, a crowd of roughly 30,000 people came to see the event, according to the The Denver Post. At one point in his speech, Sanders proffered the crowd, “what I think is the worst addiction in this country, the most dangerous, is the greed of the oligarchs. How much money do you need?” Sanders owns homes in Washington, D.C., Burlington, Vt., and a summer camp on New England’s Lake Champlain. When asked about his homes during an interview in November with Investors Hangout, he argued that contrary to criticism, his trio of domiciles are “middle-class.” Whereas Republicans previously were perceived to represent wealthy Americans, that has demonstrably changed. According Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data reported by Bloomberg, the wealth shift has produced a political climate which heavily favors the Democratic Party in America’s richest districts. As of 2021, 65% of Americans who make over $500,000 a year vote Democrat. 74% of taxpayers in districts that vote Republican had a household taxable income of less than $100,000. Furthermore, eight of the ten richest counties in the country vote Democrat. During the duo’s appearance in Arizona last Thursday, Sanders told the crowd, “we’re not going to allow you and your friend, Mr. Musk, and the other billionaires to wreak havoc on the working families of this country. No, you’re not going to destroy Social Security. You’re not going to destroy Medicaid. You’re not going to destroy the Veterans Administration.” Republicans, including President Trump have repeatedly asserted that they will not cut these programs. AOC followed the same songbook railing against the wealthy. “We’re going to throw these bums out and fight for the nation we deserve.” Sanders chimed in, “You know who the biggest criminals are in this country? They are the CEOs of major corporations who are robbing us every single day,” she told the crowd in Arizona. While she is one of the youngest members of Congress, she is a prolific fundraiser, often benefitting from the benevolence of C-Suite donors. Since 2018, she has raised roughly $49 million. She also has been accused of not aligning words with actions after receiving donations from billionaires like Tom Steyer in 2018. Evan Barker, a lifelong Democrat who helped raise millions of dollars for Democrats and volunteered at the 2020 Democratic National Convention, came out as “disenchanted, lost, sad and alone” in an article published by Newsweek last fall. In addition to fundraising and volunteering for Democrats, she also served as an alternate delegate for former Secretary of State and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and an intern for former President Barack Obama’s campaign. She now says, “It’s impossible to unsee what I’ve seen. I can only go forward. I’m not going back.” And she’s not alone. She spoke to Furthermore Podcast on Monday and cited family members’ parallel shifts. “Pretty much my entire family voted for Democrats. I have an uncle who voted for Barack Obama twice. And he was a Navy veteran and was also in the laborers union in Missouri, and since 2016 he’s voted for Donald Trump.” The political shift goes back a generation further in her family: “same case with my grandma, who wasn’t in unions herself, but worked blue collar jobs and was married to construction workers, and definitely benefited from unions and has also switched over to Donald Trump, as well as my mom, which, she was sort of like the longest holdout, and is now a Trump supporter.” That shift likely impacted voter turnout in 2024. Former President Joe Biden registered 81.2 million votes in the 2020 election. Former Vice President Kamala Harries garnered 74.7 million votes, thought that number is being challenged in a number of states like California which allowed vote counting after Election Day. Therefore, 6.5 million Biden voters sat out the 2024 election and declined to vote for Harris. According to Barker, that sentiment exists in the party down to its core. “I worked on the campaigns directly as a staffer, but I know other staffers that are still working on Democratic campaigns because it’s their livelihood, it’s their only experience, and they feel very disenchanted, and they feel like they can’t really say what they feel and what they think, because they’re still afraid of being canceled.” If Democrats have managed to build a new party image, it isn’t bearing out in polling data, either. In an SSRS survey sponsored by CNN, Democrat and Democrat-leaning voters were asked who best represents the core values of the party. Ocasio-Cortez garnered the most votes, but only with 10%. Kamala Harris received 9%, and 8% went to Bernie Sanders. All of the other names, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, received 6% or less. 5% of respondents said that no one best represents the core values of the party. TOP STORIES Barn Berning across America: AOC, Bernie Sanders take their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour national Second Amendment leaders press DOGE to stop health agencies’ gun control studies As ceasefire ends, Israeli strikes in Gaza targeted Hamas officials Angry democrats gone wild Beyond budgeting, Republicans hope to force spending ‘showdown’ with two arcane weapons LATEST EPISODES 2024 RNC Spox Elizabeth Pipko slammed Democrats for abandoning Jewish voters, praises Trump’s pro-Israel policies Rep. Perry: Watch Bob Ross for free online, taxpayers don’t need to fund PBS & NPR’s left-wing propaganda Gun Owners of America & other second amendment leaders press DOGE to stop health agencies’ gun control studies Mike Benz Unredacted: JFK assassination files show CIA’s deep & everlasting covert infiltration of US government Former Health &

Articles, Congress, Government, White House

Beyond budgeting, Republicans hope to force spending ‘showdown’ with two arcane weapons

Articles / Congress / Government / White House Beyond budgeting, Republicans hope to force spending ‘showdown’ with two arcane weapons Lawmakers openly talk about employing rescission bills and a century-old executive tool called impoundment. By: Already on a budgeting path to trim $2 trillion in government spending over the next decade, congressional Republicans are openly discussing employing two unconventional weapons to enact further cuts: rescission legislation and presidential impoundment. Most Americans have hardly ever heard such terms, but they are getting thrown around a lot on Capitol Hill these days. And there’s hope President Donald Trump will launch both into action. “He can do it through Congress with a rescission bill,” Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., the chairman of the fiscally conservative House Freedom Caucus, told the Just the News, No Noise television show this week. “But I believe he has the power to do it through impoundment. I believe that when Congress passed an appropriation bill, it sets a ceiling, it doesn’t set a concrete floor.” Rescission bills revoke funding that was previously allocated during the appropriations process. Proposed by the president, they are considered under an expedited process and cannot be filibustered in the Senate, allowing their passage with just 51 votes instead of 60. Impoundment, in which a president declines to spend the full amount allocated by Congress for a program, is an executive power likely to be tested in the courts. After former President Richard Nixon used impoundment liberally a half century ago, Congress passed the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act 1974, which introduced the new tool of rescission bills, which must be approved by both the House and the Senate. Harris suggested that law and the Constitution’s executive powers may be in conflict, prompting a possible impoundment “showdown” in the courts. In an opinion piece for The Hill newspaper, attorneys Mark Paoletta and Daniel Shapiro argued that “far from being a disturbing break with law and practice, Trump’s defense of the impoundment authority is deeply rooted in our constitutional system, good governance norms and American history and tradition.” “Presidents from both parties have criticized the act’s restrictions on the president’s ability to impound funds to reduce federal spending,” they wrote. One way or another, the process of eliminating large blocs of federal spending is already under way inside the Trump administration. In one department alone, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Secretary of State Marco Rubio has slated 83% of programs to be terminated. Rubio clarified that in alignment with this administration’s foreign policy priorities, “the 5,200 contracts that are now cancelled spent tens of billions of dollars in ways that did not serve, (and in some cases even harmed), the core national interests of the United States.” A member of the House Budget Committee told the Furthermore with Amanda Head podcast that there is a great deal of optimism for the rescission route: “It takes 50 in the Senate, and I think the House would pass it,” Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., said. Remarking on a number of alleged line items of “waste, fraud and abuse” such as payments to news organizations like Politico and U.S. taxpayers funding condoms for other nations, “it’s ridiculous, but once they see where the money is going, put it in a rescission package and make it codified,” Norman said. Texas Rep. Troy Nehls told the John Solomon Reports podcast he’s equally bullish on rescissions. “This is the first time you’ve had an administration, a president, take a deep dive and audit these agencies. Many of these agencies, they can’t even pass an audit.” And as Elon Musk at DOGE continues to uncover reported fraud, Nehls said, “you heard President Trump last week talk about Social Security and people 100, 110, 120 or 130 years old collecting Social Security. That’s fraud and these people should be held accountable. Pam Bondi goes after them all and we put these people in jail if not prison because it’s fraud and it’s in the billions of dollars.” Minority party Democrats have little to fight with, but all indications are they intend to try and most likely will use the courts as a venue. House Democrats on the Appropriations Committee posted a document titled, “Background on Unlawful Impoundment in President Trump’s Executive Orders.” That memo argues that in a number of areas including aid, foreign policy and energy production, Trump’s executive orders and plans to impound funds are unlawful. Comparing the administration’s plans to impound to that of Nixon, Senator Ron Wyden D-Ore., ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, told The Independent, “I mean, this is Donald Trump outdoing Richard Nixon.” If you want to read more of the latest by Amanda Head or the team of world class journalists at Just The News, feel free to read or subscribe by visiting JustTheNews.com today. TOP STORIES Beyond budgeting, Republicans hope to force spending ‘showdown’ with two arcane weapons Philadelphia Eagles to visit the White House to celebrate Super Bowl win After a flurry of activity right out of the gate, Trump takes victory lap in speech to America Republicans float two-part plan to avert government shutdown, White House meeting set Wednesday White House pauses all aid to Ukraine amid rift with Zelensky LATEST EPISODES Education Dept lays off ~50% of workforce, now in process of abolishing the agency, Corey DeAngelis reacts Rep. Norman: ‘If we can put a man on the moon then we can stop wasteful, fraudulent & abusive gov’t spending’ Dip Hair Care CEO Challenges Brands with Lasting Eco-Friendly Products to Sell Independent of Amazon Cornerstone University President: ‘Education’s dependency on gov’t funds stopped innovation, results in mediocracy’ Fmr. Trump Spox: Trump’s congressional address was ‘remarkable, his best speech ever,’ Dems remain ‘out of touch’ RELATED ARTICLES Beyond budgeting, Republicans hope to force spending ‘showdown’ with two arcane weapons After a flurry of activity right out of the gate, Trump takes victory lap in speech to America Republicans float two-part plan to avert government shutdown, White House meeting set Wednesday White House pauses all aid to Ukraine amid rift with Zelensky Taiwanese chipmaker commits another $100 billion

Articles, Congress, Government

Republicans float two-part plan to avert government shutdown, White House meeting set Wednesday

Articles / Congress / Government Republicans float two-part plan to avert government shutdown, White House meeting set Wednesday In less than two weeks, the American people might be facing another shutdown if Congress does not act. A possible two-stage plan might avoid that. By: Republican appropriators are designing a two-stage plan to dodge a March 14 potential government shutdown: a short term measure to continue current funding and full-year plan to begin trimming government next year by anywhere from $2 trillion to $10 trillion over the next decade. President Donald Trump also is staying deeply involved, even hosting a meeting at the White House on Wednesday with House fiscal conservatives, Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz., told Just the News on Tuesday evening. According to House Appropriations Chairman Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., and Senate Appropriations Chairwoman Susan Collins, R-Maine, a short-term funding bill would go into effect with a year-long budget for FY2025 still in the works. “A government shutdown is unacceptable, and Republicans have continually worked in earnest to deliver a deal on full-year appropriations,” Cole said in a statement. “Given the deadline before us, we are pursuing every pathway to ensure a lapse in funding never occurs. This two track strategy includes both a focus on a stopgap to provide certainty while negotiations on a full year appropriations continue.” Speaking on the divide between Democrat and Republican funding priorities, Cole added: “Democrat leadership remains laser-focused on restricting presidential authority. It’s a nonstarter and battle they lost to the American people.” Appropriations Committee ranking member Sen. Patty Murray has unofficially logged her vote as a “no” and remarked that she was “absolutely shocked” at Republicans’ plan for the stopgap. She published a document called the “anomalies” list detailing extra funding requests from the White House for programs like the WIC nutrition assistance program for pregnant women and babies, immigration enforcement and increased pay for service members. Senate working towards a short-term deal House Democrats, including Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-NY, are vehemently opposed to any DOGE-recommended spending cuts and are therefore bellicose on a shutdown. Jeffries released a statement on Sunday via his congressional website that said: “The top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, Rosa DeLauro, remains ready, willing and able to talk with our Republican colleagues, but there has been zero outreach from the Trump administration and House Republicans have walked away from the negotiating table.” One unnamed senior Democrat lawmaker told Politico that “at some point you’ve got to have a goddamn backbone. I’m not giving them a blank check until September.” On the Senate side, Collins told reporters on Monday that she and her committee were preparing a yearlong continuing resolution but are simultaneously working towards a short-term deal “to allow us time to negotiate the appropriations bills.” Trump, on X, threw his support behind a “clean, temporary” measure that continues funding through September after reportedly solidifying the plan in a meeting with House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. Republican leaders plan to release a text of the funding stopgap by Saturday as the full-year negotiations continue, according to sources privy to a closed-door Monday meeting. Those sources have declined to be identified. For Republicans who are reticent to support a continuing resolution, their concerns may be abated after a meeting set to happen at the White House on Wednesday. “I’m not a big fan of CRs for the obvious reason, you’re just continuing to spend at the same levels of Biden and Pelosi. I think there’s a lot of danger to that. But I am going with a group of conservatives to the White House tomorrow to talk to President Trump about what his plans are and to see what we can help him deliver,” Crane told the “Just the News, No Noise“ TV show Tuesday evening. The timeline for the whole process is expected to stretch into May, according to Arizona Rep. Andy Biggs. “The Senate is going to take up their version or, you know, finish that package off, completing it, a week or so after the the reconciliation comes out next week,” Biggs told the “John Solomon Reports” podcast. “So we’re talking two, three weeks out, and then you’re going to have the conference committee on it, there’s some resolution, and probably mid-May, maybe if we’re lucky, you get that reconciliation package completely done and out.” Congress: 25% approval rating Government shutdowns typically hurt the majority party and as of the last week of February, congressional approval is underwater by 22 points. According to a recent Economist/YouGov poll, 47% of respondents disapprove of the job Congress is doing while only 25% approve. After the stopgap is ironed out, the next step is reconciling the cuts envisioned by the House ($2 trillion over a decade) and the Senate ($10 trillion over same period) and incorporate identified savings from Elon Musk’s DOGE. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, a House Appropriations Committee member, told “Just the News, No Noise” on Tuesday evening that the numbers seem large until lawmakers realize just before COVID the government was about $2 trillion small just five years ago. “They put out a goal of $2 trillion. That seems large right now, but if you look at it, just to put it in perspective, that’s roughly where we were pre COVID. The Federal Government grew astronomical amount during COVID, and now there’s been attempt among the status quo, the establishment, to kind of lock that in as the new norm. That’s not what we need to do,” Cloud said. “What we need to do is is do what we can to get rid of the waste, fraud, make this lean,” he added. If you want to read more of the latest by Amanda Head or the team of world class journalists at Just The News, feel free to read or subscribe by visiting JustTheNews.com today. TOP STORIES Republicans float two-part plan to avert government shutdown, White House meeting set Wednesday White House pauses all aid to Ukraine amid rift with Zelensky Taiwanese chipmaker commits another $100 billion investment to U.S. Even before Congress acts,

Articles, Congress, Government

Johnson Called Biden To Demand More Security For Trump: GOP Rep. Clyde

Articles / Congress / Government Johnson Called Biden To Demand More Security For Trump: GOP Rep. Clyde Clyde said that he didn’t think the Secret Service needed more funding but that their priorities need to be re-examined. By: Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., said that, following the second assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, House Speaker Mike Johnson called President Joe Biden and demanded more protection for the former president. “Speaker Johnson told us yesterday in a conference that he called up President Biden and demanded of President Biden that he provide President Trump the exact same level of protection that President Biden has,” Clyde said on the “Furthermore with Amanda Head” podcast. On Friday, the House passed legislation that would increase Secret Service protection for Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. Over the weekend, there was a second assassination attempt on Trump while he was playing golf in Florida. The Secret Service has requested more funding following the second attempt. Clyde said that he didn’t think the Secret Service needed more funding but that their priorities need to be re-examined. “If indeed there seems to be some sort of a funding gap, Congress can certainly address that,” Clyde said. “But I don’t think that’s going to be necessary over the next six weeks.” “If the Secret Service would simply concentrate on their job and do their job for President Trump as well as they’re trying to do their job for President Biden, then I think that the problem would be solved,” he continued. “But it’s the priorities. It’s a reorientation of their priorities. In my opinion, that needs to happen.” TOP STORIES Trump Lawyer Suggests Jack Smith Plead The Fifth In Testimony, Suggests He's Complicit In Crimes NC GOP Chairman Says Democratic Voter Registrations Are Plummeting As Party Has 'Abandoned' Values Johnson Called Biden To Demand More Security For Trump: GOP Rep. Clyde Lawsuit, Charges Over AI Deepfake Robocalls May Shut Down Various Political Speech Before Election Ben Carson Blasts 'Woke' Pastors, Warns Church Has Left People 'Drifting In The Open Sea' LATEST EPISODES Power The Future Founder: 'The EPA is easily weaponized by environmental left; dismantle it & give power back to states' Actor, Filmmaker Sean Stone exposes political agendas in Tinseltown & unmasks media manipulation in new Trump-focused docuseries Ex-Trump Deputy Campaign Chair: First transition ruined by ‘bureaucratic interference,’ now ‘Trump is picking’ his people Restoring Honor: Fmr Acting VA Secretary Peter O'Rourke discusses Trump’s legacy of veteran support & the fight for mental health reform Jack Smith 'committed serious criminal offenses,' says Trump's Attorney, 'if I were representing him I'd tell him to take the Fifth' RELATED ARTICLES Trump Lawyer Suggests Jack Smith Plead The Fifth In Testimony, Suggests He’s Complicit In Crimes NC GOP Chairman Says Democratic Voter Registrations Are Plummeting As Party Has ‘Abandoned’ Values Johnson Called Biden To Demand More Security For Trump: GOP Rep. Clyde Lawsuit, Charges Over AI Deepfake Robocalls May Shut Down Various Political Speech Before Election Ben Carson Blasts ‘Woke’ Pastors, Warns Church Has Left People ‘Drifting In The Open Sea’ Former Trump Spokeswoman Predicts Democrats Will Swap Out Biden Following His Debate Performance Texas Rep. Nehls Urges Trump Reelection To Restore Safety In U.S Gym Owner Who Defied COVID Lockdown Calls Democratic Governors ‘Foot Soldiers’ In Closing States South Carolina Rep. Norman: Timing of Trump Trial is A ‘Farce’ Former Rep. Gohmert Slams Weaponized Justice System, Says Some Judges Abandoned Core Principles

Scroll to Top